On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Tomasz Sterna <to...@xiaoka.com> wrote: > On czw, 2010-08-26 at 12:35 -0400, Stephen Pendleton wrote: >> Also, if ejabberd doesn't want to provide proper PEP support then you >> should just remove it as a listed feature. A missing feature is better >> than a broken one. > > This may be a design flaw of the JEP/XEP process itself. > > XEPs are not versioned and one cannot say that it implements XEP-xxxx > v1.1 but not v1.2 which introduced breaking changes.
Yes, this was recognised a while ago, and new XEPs are versioned with different namespaces for incompatible changes. /K _______________________________________________ JDev mailing list Forum: http://www.jabberforum.org/forumdisplay.php?f=20 Info: http://mail.jabber.org/mailman/listinfo/jdev Unsubscribe: jdev-unsubscr...@jabber.org _______________________________________________
