> There is.The ANSI C.But just that the vendor never really stick into it.
true for the core language. but how about framework specs like J2EE? nothing like that in the C/C++ world... > both is about the same direction.The difference is Sun really made an effort for it. right. my point. that's why it is the best in that regard we get in the moment. > But there are situation that you won't know until you tried it.It happen > especially using the library /app server which does not explicitly state > in which respect it does not adhere to the standard and why if so does not > comply with the standard. well, yes. but that again can happen with any vendor on any system/platform and is hardly an argument against java. > As for the java spec, before is was release there are a number of draft > and revision release.So won't be better if somehow the vendor thing certain > part of the spec it not optimum or could be improvise, should suggest and > refine the spec ? sorry, i don't really follow you here... but if you mean that specs should be refined using feedback of vendors who (try to) implement them, yeah, i'm with you. > That why Visual J++ and it son C# is born. J++ and C#? only three words: vendor. lock. in. (and, btw, exactly the vendor i don't like the most to be locked in by ;o) > So it end of a similar fate like C++ just that if scored better ;-) we'll see about that ;o) greets -- COMPUTERBILD 15/03: Premium-e-mail-Dienste im Test -------------------------------------------------- 1. GMX TopMail - Platz 1 und Testsieger! 2. GMX ProMail - Platz 2 und Preis-Qualit�tssieger! 3. Arcor - 4. web.de - 5. T-Online - 6. freenet.de - 7. daybyday - 8. e-Post --- You are currently subscribed to jdjlist as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sys-con.com/fusetalk
