Takao Fujiwara - Tokyo S/W Center wrote: > Ghee Teo-san wrote (10/21/08 08:35 AM): >> Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote: >>> Wouldn't it be better to replace gnome-session-save with a zenity >>> script that informs the user that this functionality is not >>> working in this build? >>> >> Sounded reasonable, though we may not have time to localize it. >> Anyone from G10N knows if this is all right? > > I found the following translations from pidgin. If the either strings > are used, we can provide the translations soon. > "Feature Not Implemented" > "Not implemented yet." > > Since the word count is few, we could provide new translations in one > week. If we can approve the integration, it's ok. Otherwise I desire > not to change UI. > > I'd like to say basically now is a UI freeze for 2008.11. > My understanding is the community suggestion is the stdout of "Session > saving is not implemented yet!". So if we do this onto stdout or stderr instead of zenity, we don't need localize them, right? Since gnome-session-save is a command line, I am inclined to think a zenity dialog may not be necessary.
-Ghee > > fujiwara > >> >> -Ghee >>> Laca >>> >>> On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 16:49 +0100, Ghee Teo wrote: >>> >>>> Since gnome-session in 2.24.0 has a half finished session >>>> save/restore state. (see 6753114) That it doesn't save/restore >>>> session using XSMP, but it still provide the capplet to indicate to >>>> the system to do session saving. This is aggregating more grief for >>>> the user. So the Indiana engineering team has proposed that: >>>> (1) The GUI be cleaned up, that is the Options tab for >>>> gnome-session-properties to be hidden until session saving/restore >>>> is working. >>>> (2) Remove /usr/bin/gnome-session-save from the SUNWgnome-session >>>> package as it does not do anything at all about session. >>>> >>>> This is a Stopper fix for OpenSolaris 2008.11. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> -Ghee >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >
