Laca: > Sounds good to me. I just thought that disappearing executables > are a bad idea.
It depends. Lately ARC has been more lenient about allowing change on the basis that we should be following the community. This interface change was highlighted in the ARC materials and there was no ARC comment about this change. http://sac.sfbay.sun.com/arc/LSARC/2008/510/materials/interface-table.txt Brian > On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 13:25 +0100, Ghee Teo wrote: >> Thank you! >> I will simply pop up "Session saving is not implemented yet!" on stdout >> when gnome-session-save is run. >> I think it eases pressure from L10N and also conform to command line style. >> Laca, your thought? >> >> -Ghee >> >> Takao Fujiwara - Tokyo S/W Center wrote: >>> Ghee Teo-san wrote (10/21/08 07:15 PM): >>>> Takao Fujiwara - Tokyo S/W Center wrote: >>>>> Ghee Teo-san wrote (10/21/08 08:35 AM): >>>>>> Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote: >>>>>>> Wouldn't it be better to replace gnome-session-save with a zenity >>>>>>> script that informs the user that this functionality is not >>>>>>> working in this build? >>>>>>> >>>>>> Sounded reasonable, though we may not have time to localize it. >>>>>> Anyone from G10N knows if this is all right? >>>>> I found the following translations from pidgin. If the either >>>>> strings are used, we can provide the translations soon. >>>>> "Feature Not Implemented" >>>>> "Not implemented yet." >>>>> >>>>> Since the word count is few, we could provide new translations in >>>>> one week. If we can approve the integration, it's ok. Otherwise I >>>>> desire not to change UI. >>>>> >>>>> I'd like to say basically now is a UI freeze for 2008.11. >>>>> My understanding is the community suggestion is the stdout of >>>>> "Session saving is not implemented yet!". >>>> So if we do this onto stdout or stderr instead of zenity, we don't >>>> need localize them, right? >>>> Since gnome-session-save is a command line, I am inclined to think a >>>> zenity dialog may not be necessary. >>> Yes, now CLI messages are not required l10n. >>> Thanks for considering the option. >>> >>> fujiwara >>> >>>> -Ghee >>>> >>>>> fujiwara >>>>> >>>>>> -Ghee >>>>>>> Laca >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 16:49 +0100, Ghee Teo wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Since gnome-session in 2.24.0 has a half finished session >>>>>>>> save/restore state. (see 6753114) That it doesn't save/restore >>>>>>>> session using XSMP, but it still provide the capplet to indicate >>>>>>>> to the system to do session saving. This is aggregating more >>>>>>>> grief for the user. So the Indiana engineering team has proposed >>>>>>>> that: >>>>>>>> (1) The GUI be cleaned up, that is the Options tab for >>>>>>>> gnome-session-properties to be hidden until session >>>>>>>> saving/restore is working. >>>>>>>> (2) Remove /usr/bin/gnome-session-save from the SUNWgnome-session >>>>>>>> package as it does not do anything at all about session. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> This is a Stopper fix for OpenSolaris 2008.11. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Ghee >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> >
