Sounds good to me. I just thought that disappearing executables are a bad idea.
Thanks, Laca On Tue, 2008-10-21 at 13:25 +0100, Ghee Teo wrote: > Thank you! > I will simply pop up "Session saving is not implemented yet!" on stdout > when gnome-session-save is run. > I think it eases pressure from L10N and also conform to command line style. > Laca, your thought? > > -Ghee > > Takao Fujiwara - Tokyo S/W Center wrote: > > Ghee Teo-san wrote (10/21/08 07:15 PM): > >> Takao Fujiwara - Tokyo S/W Center wrote: > >>> Ghee Teo-san wrote (10/21/08 08:35 AM): > >>>> Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote: > >>>>> Wouldn't it be better to replace gnome-session-save with a zenity > >>>>> script that informs the user that this functionality is not > >>>>> working in this build? > >>>>> > >>>> Sounded reasonable, though we may not have time to localize it. > >>>> Anyone from G10N knows if this is all right? > >>> > >>> I found the following translations from pidgin. If the either > >>> strings are used, we can provide the translations soon. > >>> "Feature Not Implemented" > >>> "Not implemented yet." > >>> > >>> Since the word count is few, we could provide new translations in > >>> one week. If we can approve the integration, it's ok. Otherwise I > >>> desire not to change UI. > >>> > >>> I'd like to say basically now is a UI freeze for 2008.11. > >>> My understanding is the community suggestion is the stdout of > >>> "Session saving is not implemented yet!". > >> So if we do this onto stdout or stderr instead of zenity, we don't > >> need localize them, right? > >> Since gnome-session-save is a command line, I am inclined to think a > >> zenity dialog may not be necessary. > > > > Yes, now CLI messages are not required l10n. > > Thanks for considering the option. > > > > fujiwara > > > >> > >> -Ghee > >> > >>> > >>> fujiwara > >>> > >>>> > >>>> -Ghee > >>>>> Laca > >>>>> > >>>>> On Mon, 2008-10-20 at 16:49 +0100, Ghee Teo wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> Since gnome-session in 2.24.0 has a half finished session > >>>>>> save/restore state. (see 6753114) That it doesn't save/restore > >>>>>> session using XSMP, but it still provide the capplet to indicate > >>>>>> to the system to do session saving. This is aggregating more > >>>>>> grief for the user. So the Indiana engineering team has proposed > >>>>>> that: > >>>>>> (1) The GUI be cleaned up, that is the Options tab for > >>>>>> gnome-session-properties to be hidden until session > >>>>>> saving/restore is working. > >>>>>> (2) Remove /usr/bin/gnome-session-save from the SUNWgnome-session > >>>>>> package as it does not do anything at all about session. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> This is a Stopper fix for OpenSolaris 2008.11. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -Ghee > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >> > > >
