On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 17:51 +1300, Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote:
> Hi Halton,
>
> On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 12:02 +0800, Halton Huo wrote:
> > > > ln -s ../../firefox/extensions/\{fda00e13-8c62-4f63-9d19-d168115b11ca\}
> > > > \{fda00e13-8c62-4f63-9d19-d168115b11ca\}
> > >
> > > Where is this magic number coming from?
> > > In any case, I suggest you use a macro or a variable to avoid typos.
> > Good idea, apply.
>
> So where's this number coming from? (Just wondering)
These number comes from ff/tb extension xpi files.
If you unzip tracker-firefox-history-xesam.xpi, line 8 of install.rdf
will be
<em:id>{fda00e13-8c62-4f63-9d19-d168115b11ca}</em:id>
Similar with thunderbird extension.
>
> > > Okay, so the "extension" package includes ff and tb extensions
> > > for tracker? Hmm... I would prefer to have them in 2 separete
> > > pkgs: SUNWdesktop-search-firefox and SUNWdesktop-search-thunderbird,
> > > dependant upon SUNWfirefox and SUNWthunderbird respectively.
> > Accept, need I send the package name request to RE again?
>
> Yes, RE will need to register the new package names.
Will do later.
> I've just noticed, the -devel package should depend on the
> main package too (and probably many other -devel pkgs, e.g.
> SUNWgnome-base-libs-devel).
Added in.
>
> > > > # date:2008-01-23 owner:halton type:bug
> > > > bugzilla:503725,503727,503960,503966,504000
> > > > Patch4: %{name}-04-tp-reindex.diff
> > >
> > > I don't see this patch attached to any of these bug reports,
> > > are these bugids correct?
>
> > These bugs are on http://bugzilla.gnome.org
>
> Yes, that's where I was looking, but didn't see this
> patch attached to any of these 5 bug report. There was
> a different patch attached by someone else to one of them.
> I guess my question is whether this patch was submitted
> upstream.
Yes, there are no patches for on those bug reports. I need tell the
story about it.
This patch can fix those bugs, but it is a kind of rude, forces trackerd
reindex & restart when those keys are changed. There are better ways to
fix them one by one. QE requested these bugs should be fixed before
integrate into vermillion. So we offer this patch for temporary using.
>
> > > > # date:2008-01-23 owner:jerrytan type:branding
> > > > Patch7: %{name}-07-firefox-history.diff
> > >
> > > And neither does this. Are you guys pushing these upstream?
> > Will hold until tracker 0.7.x released. No schedule now, can we change
> > 06 and 07 to feature?
>
> Yes, it's definitely a feature patch and not a branding patch.
Change them to feature
>
> Thanks,
> Laca
>
