On Thu, 2007-02-22 at 11:14 +1300, Glynn Foster wrote: > b) I don't overly care about the naming of the linux/base spec > files, though I'm wondering does it set a precedent to > only create SUNW style spec files rather than worrying > about linux as well?
It doesn't. My (unwritten) policy for that is this: For conglomerate packages, use multilevel (SUNW + base) spec files. For packages that include a single module use a single SUNW spec file (no base spec). It's just easier to read and manage them this way. However, it's unlikely that we will ever use the base specs for building a Linux product so I'm not worried about keeping them buildable with rpmbuild or making sure %files is correct. We could probably even delete the %files sections but that may be one step too far. Laca
