On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 17:22 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote: > Shouldn't all new spec-files have a "License:" field in the header > which explains the license? Most of our spec-files already have > this.
In RPM, the License tag is required. I think it's useful to have them in our spec files too, but we now have more detailed info in the copyright files. > > Please review these spec files for adding groff to spec-files. > > > > Padraig >
