Laca: > On Tue, 2008-08-05 at 17:22 -0500, Brian Cameron wrote: >> Shouldn't all new spec-files have a "License:" field in the header >> which explains the license? Most of our spec-files already have >> this. > > In RPM, the License tag is required. I think it's useful to have > them in our spec files too, but we now have more detailed info > in the copyright files.
Right, but the RE team plans to use the modulediffs script to generate the report that Dee uses to determine when we need to do OSR. When a module changes license, this triggers a new OSR. Thus, we should be making an effort to ensure that the License field in the spec-file is accurate. Brian
