Hi Andy
Andy Seaborne wrote:
I added JENA-110 (remove RDB) because it wil not get properly tested
anyway). As preparation, I've tagged the codebase to make the
post-license text changes, last-of-RDB state findable in case someone
needes to drag it out of the vault.
A patch is available, but I might have missed things (and I did not test
it properly, just run the Jena test suite and check things would have
worked for SDB only.
There is a patch for the source code of Jena only (and I apologise that
the patch no longer aligned to the codebase because of the license text
rewrites). The tagged code really does need to be with the Apache
license on it.
Yep.
I imagine the patch will not apply cleanly anymore. It has only value in
showing what's the stuff which needs to be removed.
Not sure what "would have worked for SDB only" means; SDB has an unused
RDB adpater and the support configuration files.
When I did the patch, I tested that nothing that as been removed was used
by SDB (since I did not know that for sure). The only two instances were
actually unused code which is good.
I am not 100% sure if removing assemblers for RDB has implications for
things such as Joseki. I did not have time to check that.
Either the documentation (i.e. doc/) is fixed up, albeit crudely, or do
we drop doc/ now? (I've taken it out of the zip assembly)
Did we decide/agree to remove doc/ and have the documentation on-line?
If not, I would prefer to have just one place where the documentation
is and one place to update when documentation needs to be updated.
Paolo
Andy
