I agree though, that maven central would be much better long term. On 5 April 2012 23:47, Chris van Es <cva...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Does the comment > > "If you are exposing your source and want to make it easy for others to > build, then consider adding a repository entry to your POM, but don’t pick > a URL lightly, think long-term, and use a URL that will always be under > your control." > > not agree with what the other guys have been saying? > > Chris. > > 2012/4/5 Arnaud Héritier <aherit...@gmail.com> > >> It was detailled here : >> http://www.sonatype.com/people/2009/02/why-putting-repositories-in-your-poms-is-a-bad-idea/ >> >> >> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Chris van Es <cva...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I don't see anything wrong with specifying a repo which is under >>> developers control in the parent pom. It's a feature of maven and I use >>> this feature regularly within my workplace to force our builds to use a >>> repository manager for all dependencies and keep everything internal. I >>> don't know Jenkins well enough but it might prove useful in future to limit >>> the versions of core dependencies available to plugins. >>> >>> Chris. >>> >>> >>> On 5 April 2012 17:43, Kohsuke Kawaguchi <kkawagu...@cloudbees.com>wrote: >>> >>>> On 04/05/2012 06:03 AM, Stephen Connolly wrote: >>>> >>>>> As Nicolas wrote, repo.jenkins-ci.org <http://repo.jenkins-ci.org> >>>>> >>>>> is our domain that we control, so the same thing won't happen again. >>>>> >>>>> (There is a separate effort to make more of our artifacts available >>>>> in central, which would eliminate this problem in a long run, but we >>>>> shouldn't wait for that.) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Why not just hurry that effort along ;-) >>>>> >>>> >>>> Are you volunteering? >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Kohsuke Kawaguchi | CloudBees, Inc. | http://cloudbees.com/ >>>> Try Nectar, our professional version of Jenkins >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> ----- >> Arnaud Héritier >> 06-89-76-64-24 >> http://aheritier.net >> Mail/GTalk: aherit...@gmail.com >> Twitter/Skype : aheritier >> >> >
