> On 09.06.2016, at 14:57, Oleg Nenashev <[email protected]> wrote: > > I would also consider PR 2379, because it slightly improves Jenkins WebUI > performance.
Could we please remember what constitutes a change eligible for back porting? Because this isn't. I like the change as well, but it's a tiny performance improvement. > On 09.06.2016, at 18:07, nicolas de loof <[email protected]> wrote: > > Any chance for > https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/commit/310c952602f7241cb74454b7e7fb2be0bf3d2980 > to be backported ? > https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-34923 Similar problem. It's an improvement/feature. We're already drowning Oliver in legitimate requests, wanting features in LTS is overkill ;-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/42EC5EF4-DAFA-4F20-8DBA-00A7B23D9BB5%40beckweb.net. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
