> > JENKINS-35402 is the only one that I am asking for. I know technically it > is a feature but it is a simple refactoring and I believe it will be needed > for some use cases with regard to people that are repackaging Jenkins... > there are other ways around if we cannot get this in, but those other ways > are considerably more ugly and require adding a lot more code to a > repackaged Jenkins WAR than would be required with this small change > <https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/commit/53f89740e94b7fe9a517d5858e438de3fd80a5f2> >
I agree that this change would be useful && it's harmless. So it may be fine to merge it into .1 or maybe .2 пятница, 10 июня 2016 г., 0:20:39 UTC+2 пользователь Stephen Connolly написал: > > JENKINS-35402 is the only one that I am asking for. I know technically it > is a feature but it is a simple refactoring and I believe it will be needed > for some use cases with regard to people that are repackaging Jenkins... > there are other ways around if we cannot get this in, but those other ways > are considerably more ugly and require adding a lot more code to a > repackaged Jenkins WAR than would be required with this small change > <https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/commit/53f89740e94b7fe9a517d5858e438de3fd80a5f2> > > On 9 June 2016 at 23:05, Daniel Beck <[email protected] <javascript:>> > wrote: > >> >> > On 09.06.2016, at 14:57, Oleg Nenashev <[email protected] >> <javascript:>> wrote: >> > >> > I would also consider PR 2379, because it slightly improves Jenkins >> WebUI performance. >> >> Could we please remember what constitutes a change eligible for back >> porting? >> >> Because this isn't. I like the change as well, but it's a tiny >> performance improvement. >> >> >> > On 09.06.2016, at 18:07, nicolas de loof <[email protected] >> <javascript:>> wrote: >> > >> > Any chance for >> https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/commit/310c952602f7241cb74454b7e7fb2be0bf3d2980 >> >> to be backported ? >> > https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-34923 >> >> Similar problem. It's an improvement/feature. >> >> >> We're already drowning Oliver in legitimate requests, wanting features in >> LTS is overkill ;-) >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Jenkins Developers" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected] <javascript:>. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/42EC5EF4-DAFA-4F20-8DBA-00A7B23D9BB5%40beckweb.net >> . >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/e0431963-cda0-4460-a604-6ef7478cd57b%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
