On 10 June 2016 at 11:25, Oleg Nenashev <[email protected]> wrote:
> JENKINS-35402 is the only one that I am asking for. I know technically it >> is a feature but it is a simple refactoring and I believe it will be needed >> for some use cases with regard to people that are repackaging Jenkins... >> there are other ways around if we cannot get this in, but those other ways >> are considerably more ugly and require adding a lot more code to a >> repackaged Jenkins WAR than would be required with this small change >> <https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/commit/53f89740e94b7fe9a517d5858e438de3fd80a5f2> >> > > I agree that this change would be useful && it's harmless. > So it may be fine to merge it into .1 or maybe .2 > Either it goes into .1 or it doesn't go in IMHO > > пятница, 10 июня 2016 г., 0:20:39 UTC+2 пользователь Stephen Connolly > написал: >> >> JENKINS-35402 is the only one that I am asking for. I know technically it >> is a feature but it is a simple refactoring and I believe it will be needed >> for some use cases with regard to people that are repackaging Jenkins... >> there are other ways around if we cannot get this in, but those other ways >> are considerably more ugly and require adding a lot more code to a >> repackaged Jenkins WAR than would be required with this small change >> <https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/commit/53f89740e94b7fe9a517d5858e438de3fd80a5f2> >> >> On 9 June 2016 at 23:05, Daniel Beck <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> > On 09.06.2016, at 14:57, Oleg Nenashev <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > I would also consider PR 2379, because it slightly improves Jenkins >>> WebUI performance. >>> >>> Could we please remember what constitutes a change eligible for back >>> porting? >>> >>> Because this isn't. I like the change as well, but it's a tiny >>> performance improvement. >>> >>> >>> > On 09.06.2016, at 18:07, nicolas de loof <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> > Any chance for >>> https://github.com/jenkinsci/jenkins/commit/310c952602f7241cb74454b7e7fb2be0bf3d2980 >>> to be backported ? >>> > https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-34923 >>> >>> Similar problem. It's an improvement/feature. >>> >>> >>> We're already drowning Oliver in legitimate requests, wanting features >>> in LTS is overkill ;-) >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/42EC5EF4-DAFA-4F20-8DBA-00A7B23D9BB5%40beckweb.net >>> . >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Jenkins Developers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/e0431963-cda0-4460-a604-6ef7478cd57b%40googlegroups.com > <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/e0431963-cda0-4460-a604-6ef7478cd57b%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> > . > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CA%2BnPnMx_rWm8ROVUo0fQmYmEKU93QKx7vkAJQpXWTmYrb2k4Yg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
