https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/jenkinsci-dev/O_g1kk39TBQ is quite related to this thread. We might want to consider 2.198 as a baseline, just for discussion.
On Wednesday, November 20, 2019 at 3:49:31 PM UTC+1, Oleg Nenashev wrote: > > 2.205 exploded due to https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-60199, > but IIUC it could be mitigated by upgrade guidelines. > It discourages selecting 2.205 s the new LTS baseline anyway, IMHO needs > more soak testing for other possible regressions > > +1 for 2.204. It has some negative community ratings, but I do not see > particular issues in JIRA which would block it. > All changes are relatively minor, and 2.203 ratings were fine. > > In 2.204 we would really want to have > https://issues.jenkins-ci.org/browse/JENKINS-59679 from Zbynek so that we > can proceed with plugin documentation migration.without impacting UX for > LTS users. > > Best regards, > Oleg > > On Wednesday, November 20, 2019 at 3:05:23 PM UTC+1, Jesse Glick wrote: >> >> 2.204 sounds reasonable. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/a3026a36-8f17-4804-98d3-cc70c24a7d75%40googlegroups.com.
