On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 11:28 AM Tim Jacomb <timjaco...@gmail.com> wrote: > > It would be good to see a more recent report given we’re on version 9 in core > to see if anything has changed in recent versions
Great point, Tim. Core 2.273 shipped with ASM 5.0.3, prior to the upgrade of JNR (and therefore the accidental upgrade of ASM) in 2.274. Here are the differences between ASM 5.0.3 and ASM 9.1: https://diff.revapi.org/?groupId=org.ow2.asm&artifactId=asm&old=5.0.3&new=9.1 https://diff.revapi.org/?groupId=org.ow2.asm&artifactId=asm-analysis&old=5.0.3&new=9.1 https://diff.revapi.org/?groupId=org.ow2.asm&artifactId=asm-commons&old=5.0.3&new=9.1 https://diff.revapi.org/?groupId=org.ow2.asm&artifactId=asm-tree&old=5.0.3&new=9.1 https://diff.revapi.org/?groupId=org.ow2.asm&artifactId=asm-util&old=5.0.3&new=9.1 The library seems quite stable between 5.0.3 and 9.1. Apart from new classes and the addition of generics, nothing seems to have been removed or renamed. (Similarly, recent versions of Guava are more stable than older versions.) In any case, I doubt we would roll back the JNR changes made in 2.274 at this point. For better or for worse, ASM 9.1 is here to stay as part of the core API, so we might as well own it in the short term. (In the long term, removing or hiding Guice/JNR and therefore Guava/ASM would be nice, of course.) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Jenkins Developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to jenkinsci-dev+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-dev/CAFwNDjqts8pUmgTnqk%2B3ZcpkadSswCNNBO7-8Uz5fFoYXcqzWA%40mail.gmail.com.
