I think you must be right, my solution was to stop caring where the flow 
runs, and focus on an alternative method of retrieving the report/log data. 
I used the Build Flow Toolbox which lets you copy files with the flow:
job = build('downstream job')
toolbox.copyFiles(job.workspace, build.workspace)
//Unrelated but also useful:
out.println job.build.log



On Sunday, March 8, 2015 at 9:03:30 AM UTC-7, stefan thomasson wrote:
>
> Hi,
> If i understood your description, i am wondering if this Isn't the 
> expected behaviour for buildflow as it is a "fly weight" job and therefore 
> do not consume any executors?
>
> 5 mar 2015 kl. 23:39 skrev Ty Satrang <ty.sa...@gmail.com <javascript:>>:
>
> I am not sure how you want to receive that, but here is a gist of the 
> config that will reproduce the issue. 
> Flow: https://gist.github.com/tsatrangtw/73a391aa75b45cb38235
> Downsteam: https://gist.github.com/tsatrangtw/4c20c9a85ce63081c160
>
>
> On Thursday, March 5, 2015 at 2:15:47 PM UTC-8, rginga wrote:
>>
>>  Can you provide a simple example of your main buildflow job?
>>
>>  
>>
>> *From:* jenkins...@googlegroups.com [mailto:jenkins...@googlegroups.com] *On 
>> Behalf Of *Ty Satrang
>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 05, 2015 5:12 PM
>> *To:* jenkins...@googlegroups.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [Build flow plugin] Cannot load balance multiple workflows
>>
>>  
>>  
>> Thank you, I did see this copy pasta in another thread, and I did try 
>> changing the scheduling strategy with a plug-in. It seems that this 
>> particular problem is somewhat exclusive to the Build Flow plugin. It 
>> doesn't just queue jobs up, as you can see in the image link, it runs the 
>> flow jobs all at once on a single node.
>>  
>>
>> On Thursday, March 5, 2015 at 11:46:37 AM UTC-8, rginga wrote:
>>  
>> Maybe I misunderstand your problem. Let’s keep it simple.
>>
>>  
>>
>> The reason the multiple runs of your build flow job run on the same node 
>> is because, when selecting a node, it tries to run it one the same node it 
>> previously ran on (#2 in the Strategy below). If your nodes had just 1 
>> executor defined, then any consecutive runs would run on different nodes. 
>> But with 8 executors, it just runs it there.
>>
>>  
>>
>> *Scheduling strategy*
>>
>> Some slaves are faster, while others are slow. Some slaves are closer 
>> (network wise) to a master, others are far away. So doing a good build 
>> distribution is a challenge. Currently, Jenkins employs the following 
>> strategy:
>>
>>    1. If a project is configured to stick to one computer, that's always 
>>    honored.
>>    2. Jenkins tries to build a project on the same computer that it was 
>>    previously built.
>>    3. Jenkins tries to move long builds to slaves, because the amount of 
>>    network interaction between a master and a slave tends to be logarithmic 
>> to 
>>    the duration of a build (IOW, even if project A takes twice as long to 
>>    build as project B, it won't require double network transfer.) So this 
>>    strategy reduces the network overhead.
>>
>>  If you have interesting ideas (or better yet, implementations), please 
>> let me know.
>>
>>  
>>
>> *From:* jenkins...@googlegroups.com [mailto:jenkins...@googlegroups.com] *On 
>> Behalf Of *Ty Satrang
>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 05, 2015 1:52 PM
>> *To:* jenkins...@googlegroups.com
>> *Subject:* Re: [Build flow plugin] Cannot load balance multiple workflows
>>
>>  
>>  
>> "if you have a label assigned to many slaves, each with one executor, it 
>> will do what you want"
>> My slaves do all share the same label and I tried to "Restrict where 
>> this project can be run" and I get the same behavior.
>>
>> "One way to do what you want is to have each “archive” whatever files 
>> you want which puts them onto the Jenkins server and then use “Copy 
>> artifacts from another project”"
>>  
>> I suppose this could work, but does it copy the files to the workspace or 
>> does it just archive them? I am using a plugin to publish reports from the 
>> workspace.
>>  
>>  
>>  
>>
>> On Thursday, March 5, 2015 at 8:12:59 AM UTC-8, rginga wrote:
>>  
>> Its strategy is to try to use the same node it last built on. If you have 
>> available executors, it will use one. if you have a label assigned to many 
>> slaves, each with one executor, it will do what you want.
>>
>>  
>>
>> One way to do what you want is to have each “archive” whatever files you 
>> want which puts them onto the Jenkins server and then use “Copy artifacts 
>> from another project”
>>
>>  
>>
>> *From:* jenkins...@googlegroups.com [mailto:jenkins...@googlegroups.com] *On 
>> Behalf Of *Ty Satrang
>> *Sent:* Thursday, March 05, 2015 3:50 AM
>> *To:* jenkins...@googlegroups.com
>> *Subject:* [Build flow plugin] Cannot load balance multiple workflows
>>
>>  
>>  
>> http://i.imgur.com/VEZ1Erc.png
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> For some reason my flow jobs like to all run on a single node instead of 
>> choosing an idle node.
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> This is a problem for me because I am using the Node and Label parameter 
>> plugin 
>> <https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/NodeLabel+Parameter+Plugin> to 
>> run the jobs on the same VM as the flow job so I can copy the reports and 
>> logs to the parent workspace for publishing.
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> I tried using the Least Load plugin 
>> <http://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Least+Load+Plugin>, but I 
>> get the same behavior.
>>   
>>  
>>  
>> I also tried the Throttle Concurrent Builds Plug-in 
>> <http://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Throttle+Concurrent+Builds+Plugin>
>>  to 
>> restrict the jobs per node to 1, to no effect.
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> I am just realizing this now but, maybe it would be easier to get the 
>> files to the parent workspace another way and let the flow jobs all run on 
>> whatever single node they want. (maybe? 
>> https://github.com/dnozay/build-flow-toolbox-plugin )
>>  
>>  
>>   
>>  
>>  
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Jenkins Users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to jenkinsci-use...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/3d1d0150-3125-4b54-a846-b0a6687022cf%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/3d1d0150-3125-4b54-a846-b0a6687022cf%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>   
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Jenkins Users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to jenkinsci-use...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/0a9cb8a5-d3ef-4f02-8506-0e4b0a986493%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/0a9cb8a5-d3ef-4f02-8506-0e4b0a986493%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>   
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Jenkins Users" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to jenkinsci-use...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/e787a0c5-7c45-4100-af52-05269ce704d6%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/e787a0c5-7c45-4100-af52-05269ce704d6%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>  
>  -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Jenkins Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to jenkinsci-use...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/aea6321b-8ab0-4311-b405-3dda4f533458%40googlegroups.com
>  
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/aea6321b-8ab0-4311-b405-3dda4f533458%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Jenkins Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to jenkinsci-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/jenkinsci-users/5ab0ebd1-cb3a-4045-82b6-30b403bdb6f6%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to