on 10/22/01 1:12 AM, "Gunnar Rønning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't think you understand what I said. I don't say that you and I can't > qualify other solutions, but if this guy cannot qualify why it makes more > sense to use Velocity than JSP for a given project then his management > will choose JSP. I don't think you understand what I said either. :-) My point is that there are a ton of well documented reasons (even published as cover stories in mass distributed magazines) for why one should not use JSP. > If you don't know why you change, then why bother changing ? > It's a bit the same for other server technology, we all know Linux is more > stable than Windows, we all know PostgreSQL is a more robust and faster > database solution than MySQL, etc. But people still use the latter technology > ? > Why ? Because they like to continue using what they already know, and in some > cases that is fine, it really depends on the scope of the project. When did PostgreSQL become faster than MySQL? -jon --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
