Hi David, >> Has anyone successfully used OJB as his Persistence Layer in Jetspeed?
> I started writing a Registry service with OJB. Its in the cvs. Didn't finish though, ran out of time. How far have you been from finishing it? Is it worth to continue ist development or start over? >> Does anyone know if there are plans on moving to OJB? Turbine will be >> moving to OJB. Another question. We have developped a full blown >> Turbine > Are you sure that Turbine is moving to OJB or is Torque being merged with OJB? I am quit sure 99,9%. I have read an artivle on the OJB Mailing list written by the creator of OJB that he is in close contact with the Turbine Guys and that OJB is supposed to replace Torque in the upcoming Versions of Turbine ( Versions after 2.2 has finally been released ;) ). As far as I know OJB still use Torque Funtionality for the generation of Java Skeleton Classes. This could result into merging, but only for this part, since OJB uses reflection to access the Objects. >> App. Is it possible to integrate this Application with Jetspeed? Is >> there any documentaion that I am overseeing? >Jetspeed is a Turbine application. >Not really sure what you want to do. >If you have velocity templates and actions, they should port easily to the Velocity portlet. Likewise for JSP templates, porting to the JSPPortlet. Or you >can just leave your application as is, and proxy it via an IFramePortlet or WebPagePortlet. Would that be create a new pane with the Turbine App as a name once Clicked on use the WebPagePortlet as a Container (Proxy)? This sounds exactly like the solution I was looking for. Thanx and kind regards Juergen Hoffmann -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
