Randy,

I will try to test on 2.1 tomorrow, even though I highly doubt migrating
to a "beta" version of J2 will make its way to prod... I so wish there
could be a "stable" release with this feature integrated already.

Hmm.. at worst, I think there's still a way to simulate this by
duplicating the whole page and putting the correct constraints on a
page-basis. Really not flexible, but in the meantime...

One more thing: is there a readable log of modifications brought in at
each version of J2 ?

Thanks,
Ludovic


> Ludovic,
>
> Any way you can try this on the 2.1-dev/svn HEAD release? I'm a bit
> pressed for time these days, but I'll give you a hand if you still see
> the issue with 2.1-dev... yes, it should work.
>
> Randy
>
> On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 22:42 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Sorry to revive that old subject, but it looks like it's exactly the
>> problem I am encountering. Basically here's what I'm trying to achieve :
>> <page ...>
>>     <security-constraints>
>>         <security-constraint>
>>             <groups>groupOne,groupTwo</groups>
>>             <permissions>view</permissions>
>>         </security-constraint>
>>     </security-constraints>
>>
>>     <fragment ... type="layout">
>>     <fragment ... type="portlet">
>>         <security-constraints>
>>             <security-constraint>
>>                 <groups>groupOne</groups>
>>             </security-constraint>
>>             <security-constraint>
>>                 <groups>groupTwo</groups>
>>                 <permissions>groupTwo</permissions>
>>             </security-constraint>
>>         </security-constraints>
>> However, "groupOne" still has the rights to view the portlet...
>>
>> According to the replies, it *should* be possible, even if I am reading
>> "Note that only the view permission is checked against these
>> constraints"
>> here:
>> http://portals.apache.org/jetspeed-2/guides/guide-security-declarative-psml.html
>> Just like Randy suggested, I have upgraded to 2.0.1, but still no
>> results.
>>
>> Does anyone see something else I could try ?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ludovic
>>
>>
>> > If you use eclipse, I suggest using the subclipse plugin...
>> >
>> > On 7/6/06, Enrique Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Hi Randy,
>> >>
>> >> Ok, so I must install svn, get the source with that command you
>> pointed
>> >> me out and follow the instructions described here
>> >> (http://portals.apache.org/jetspeed-2/getting-started-source.html,
>> >> sections 5&6), mustn't I?
>> >> Is it the same for 2.1-dev??
>> >>
>> >> Thanks a lot,
>> >> Enrique
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > -----Mensaje original-----
>> >> > De: Randy Watler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> > Enviado el: miércoles, 05 de julio de 2006 16:46
>> >> > Para: Jetspeed Users List
>> >> > Asunto: RE: Security constraints for fragments
>> >> >
>> >> > Enrique,
>> >> >
>> >> > One must build that version from source. The 2.0.1 has not been
>> pushed
>> >> > to the maven repository. Use the svn command below to pull the
>> source
>> >> > and follow the instructions on building from source on the web
>> site.
>> >> >
>> >> > HTH,
>> >> >
>> >> > Randy
>> >> >
>> >> > On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 13:29 +0200, Enrique Perez wrote:
>> >> > > Sorry Randy,
>> >> > >
>> >> > > But still don't know how to install that specific version... =S
>> >> > > I've tried to download "jetspeed plugin" (-Dversion=2.0.1) but
>> maven
>> >> is
>> >> > > unable to find it in any repository...
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Is there any getting-started-guide for this release? Any
>> >> step-by-step
>> >> > > document??
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Thanks,
>> >> > > Enrique
>> >> > >
>> >> > > > -----Mensaje original-----
>> >> > > > De: Randy Watler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> > > > Enviado el: martes, 04 de julio de 2006 17:10
>> >> > > > Para: Jetspeed Users List
>> >> > > > Asunto: RE: Security constraints for fragments
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Enrique,
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/portals/jetspeed-
>> >> > > > 2/branches/JETSPEED-BRANCH-2.0.1 jetspeed-2
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Yes, I believe that the sizes property was broken in 2.0 as
>> well.
>> >> I
>> >> > > > think 2.0.1 fixes that as well. Nested layouts were initially
>> >> fixed in
>> >> > > > 2.0.1, but Ate put in a ton of work to make them much better in
>> >> > > 2.1-dev.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Randy
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 09:48 +0200, Enrique Perez wrote:
>> >> > > > > Hi Randy,
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > Where can I find the version 2.0.1?? Or how can I build that
>> >> version
>> >> > > > > with Maven 1.0.2?? Maybe modifying build.properties and
>> setting
>> >> > > > > "jetspeed.version" to the value "2.0.1"??
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > And do you know if there is also a bug with the fragment's
>> >> property
>> >> > > for
>> >> > > > > setting the size of the columns in my version?? I mean, I'm
>> >> trying
>> >> > > to
>> >> > > > > set 20% for left column and 80% for right one with this tag:
>> >> > > > > <fragment id="x" type="layout"
>> >> > > > > name="jetspeed-layouts::VelocityTwoColumns">
>> >> > > > >                 <property layout="TwoColumns" name="sizes"
>> >> > > > > value="20%,80%"/>
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > but it seems to have no effect.
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > > > > Thanks again,
>> >> > > > > Enrique
>> >> > > > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> > >
>> >> > >
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to