Well Aaron,

The work I have taken involves creating a new portal app. That's why I
wouldn't like to skip step 4 since it'd still be required for later
developments anyway.
On the other hand, since you've got a 2.1-dev upish already, maybe you
could test and confirm that security-constraints does work inside fragment
scope ? ;)

Again, here's my goal :
>> >> >> <page ...>
>> >> >>     <security-constraints>
>> >> >>         <security-constraint>
>> >> >>             <groups>groupOne,groupTwo</groups>
>> >> >>             <permissions>view</permissions>
>> >> >>         </security-constraint>
>> >> >>     </security-constraints>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>     <fragment ... type="layout">
>> >> >>     <fragment ... type="portlet">
>> >> >>         <security-constraints>
>> >> >>             <security-constraint>
>> >> >>                 <groups>groupOne</groups>
>> >> >>             </security-constraint>
>> >> >>             <security-constraint>
>> >> >>                 <groups>groupTwo</groups>
>> >> >>                 <permissions>view</permissions>
>> >> >>             </security-constraint>
>> >> >>         </security-constraints>

By the way, I have omitted one step when writing my procedure in the mail,
which was "maven allClean allBuild"... AFAIR, allClean goal clears the
maven cache like you mention.

Ludovic


> I built from source (SVN head) using the 2.1-dev plugin the other day
> and it worked fine.  You have to make sure you clear your maven cache
> and download the 2.1-dev plugin first
> and then follow the instructions for building from source.
>
> For building from source for these instructions:
>
> http://portals.apache.org/jetspeed-2/getting-started-source.html
>
> substitute 2.1-dev for the plugin version and skip section 4 but do
> section 5, "Build Jetspeed 2 from source".
>
> -aaron
>
>
>
> On 8/28/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Randy,
>>
>> I wish I could help you testing, but I can't even succeed in deploying a
>> J2.1 portal ! ;(
>>
>> So far, I've been following the same procedure (which works fine for
>> v2.0
>> and v2.0.1) :
>> - edit build.properties
>> - check out from SVN (v2.0.1 and v2.1) or download from Maven (v2.0)
>> - maven initMavenPlugin
>> - maven j2:portal.genapp
>> - add missing wars to /target/jetspeed/WEB-INF/deploy
>> - maven war:install
>> - deploy war using Tomcat Manager
>>
>> Sorry if this is getting a bit out of topic, but here's the log :
>>   INFO: Jetspeed Starting Initialization...
>>   INFO: JetspeedServlet identifying web application root...
>>   INFO: JetspeedServlet identifed web application root as
>> /usr/local/tomcat/webapps/jetspeed/
>>   INFO: JetspeedServlet attempting to create the  portlet engine...
>>   FATAL: Jetspeed: init() failed: java.lang.InstantiationError:
>> org.apache.jetspeed.JetspeedActions at
>> org.apache.jetspeed.JetspeedPortalContext.<init>(JetspeedPortalContext.java:77)
>>
>> Ludovic
>>
>>
>> > Ludovic,
>> >
>> > Ok. I'll see if I can get to testing in a few days. I am slammed with
>> > overly aggressive non J2 schedules at the moment. If you do find more
>> > information in the interim, please add it to this thread.
>> >
>> > Randy
>> >
>> > On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 08:09 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >> Randy,
>> >>
>> >> I will try to test on 2.1 tomorrow, even though I highly doubt
>> migrating
>> >> to a "beta" version of J2 will make its way to prod... I so wish
>> there
>> >> could be a "stable" release with this feature integrated already.
>> >>
>> >> Hmm.. at worst, I think there's still a way to simulate this by
>> >> duplicating the whole page and putting the correct constraints on a
>> >> page-basis. Really not flexible, but in the meantime...
>> >>
>> >> One more thing: is there a readable log of modifications brought in
>> at
>> >> each version of J2 ?
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Ludovic
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > Ludovic,
>> >> >
>> >> > Any way you can try this on the 2.1-dev/svn HEAD release? I'm a bit
>> >> > pressed for time these days, but I'll give you a hand if you still
>> see
>> >> > the issue with 2.1-dev... yes, it should work.
>> >> >
>> >> > Randy
>> >> >
>> >> > On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 22:42 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >> >> Hi,
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Sorry to revive that old subject, but it looks like it's exactly
>> the
>> >> >> problem I am encountering. Basically here's what I'm trying to
>> >> achieve :
>> >> >> <page ...>
>> >> >>     <security-constraints>
>> >> >>         <security-constraint>
>> >> >>             <groups>groupOne,groupTwo</groups>
>> >> >>             <permissions>view</permissions>
>> >> >>         </security-constraint>
>> >> >>     </security-constraints>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>     <fragment ... type="layout">
>> >> >>     <fragment ... type="portlet">
>> >> >>         <security-constraints>
>> >> >>             <security-constraint>
>> >> >>                 <groups>groupOne</groups>
>> >> >>             </security-constraint>
>> >> >>             <security-constraint>
>> >> >>                 <groups>groupTwo</groups>
>> >> >>                 <permissions>groupTwo</permissions>
>> >> >>             </security-constraint>
>> >> >>         </security-constraints>
>> >> >> However, "groupOne" still has the rights to view the portlet...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> According to the replies, it *should* be possible, even if I am
>> >> reading
>> >> >> "Note that only the view permission is checked against these
>> >> >> constraints"
>> >> >> here:
>> >> >> http://portals.apache.org/jetspeed-2/guides/guide-security-declarative-psml.html
>> >> >> Just like Randy suggested, I have upgraded to 2.0.1, but still no
>> >> >> results.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Does anyone see something else I could try ?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Thanks,
>> >> >> Ludovic
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> > If you use eclipse, I suggest using the subclipse plugin...
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On 7/6/06, Enrique Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> >> Hi Randy,
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Ok, so I must install svn, get the source with that command you
>> >> >> pointed
>> >> >> >> me out and follow the instructions described here
>> >> >> >> (http://portals.apache.org/jetspeed-2/getting-started-source.html,
>> >> >> >> sections 5&6), mustn't I?
>> >> >> >> Is it the same for 2.1-dev??
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> Thanks a lot,
>> >> >> >> Enrique
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> > -----Mensaje original-----
>> >> >> >> > De: Randy Watler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> >> > Enviado el: miÃ(c)rcoles, 05 de julio de 2006 16:46
>> >> >> >> > Para: Jetspeed Users List
>> >> >> >> > Asunto: RE: Security constraints for fragments
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Enrique,
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > One must build that version from source. The 2.0.1 has not
>> been
>> >> >> pushed
>> >> >> >> > to the maven repository. Use the svn command below to pull
>> the
>> >> >> source
>> >> >> >> > and follow the instructions on building from source on the
>> web
>> >> >> site.
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > HTH,
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > Randy
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 13:29 +0200, Enrique Perez wrote:
>> >> >> >> > > Sorry Randy,
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> > > But still don't know how to install that specific
>> version...
>> >> =S
>> >> >> >> > > I've tried to download "jetspeed plugin" (-Dversion=2.0.1)
>> but
>> >> >> maven
>> >> >> >> is
>> >> >> >> > > unable to find it in any repository...
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> > > Is there any getting-started-guide for this release? Any
>> >> >> >> step-by-step
>> >> >> >> > > document??
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> > > Thanks,
>> >> >> >> > > Enrique
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> > > > -----Mensaje original-----
>> >> >> >> > > > De: Randy Watler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> >> > > > Enviado el: martes, 04 de julio de 2006 17:10
>> >> >> >> > > > Para: Jetspeed Users List
>> >> >> >> > > > Asunto: RE: Security constraints for fragments
>> >> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > Enrique,
>> >> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/portals/jetspeed-
>> >> >> >> > > > 2/branches/JETSPEED-BRANCH-2.0.1 jetspeed-2
>> >> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > Yes, I believe that the sizes property was broken in 2.0
>> as
>> >> >> well.
>> >> >> >> I
>> >> >> >> > > > think 2.0.1 fixes that as well. Nested layouts were
>> >> initially
>> >> >> >> fixed in
>> >> >> >> > > > 2.0.1, but Ate put in a ton of work to make them much
>> better
>> >> in
>> >> >> >> > > 2.1-dev.
>> >> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > Randy
>> >> >> >> > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 09:48 +0200, Enrique Perez wrote:
>> >> >> >> > > > > Hi Randy,
>> >> >> >> > > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > > Where can I find the version 2.0.1?? Or how can I build
>> >> that
>> >> >> >> version
>> >> >> >> > > > > with Maven 1.0.2?? Maybe modifying build.properties and
>> >> >> setting
>> >> >> >> > > > > "jetspeed.version" to the value "2.0.1"??
>> >> >> >> > > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > > And do you know if there is also a bug with the
>> fragment's
>> >> >> >> property
>> >> >> >> > > for
>> >> >> >> > > > > setting the size of the columns in my version?? I mean,
>> >> I'm
>> >> >> >> trying
>> >> >> >> > > to
>> >> >> >> > > > > set 20% for left column and 80% for right one with this
>> >> tag:
>> >> >> >> > > > > <fragment id="x" type="layout"
>> >> >> >> > > > > name="jetspeed-layouts::VelocityTwoColumns">
>> >> >> >> > > > >                 <property layout="TwoColumns"
>> name="sizes"
>> >> >> >> > > > > value="20%,80%"/>
>> >> >> >> > > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > > but it seems to have no effect.
>> >> >> >> > > > >
>> >> >> >> > > > > Thanks again,
>> >> >> >> > > > > Enrique
>> >> >> >> > > > >
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> >> >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> > >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> >
>> >> >> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> >> > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >>
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> > For additional commands, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to