Ludovic, Ok. I'll see if I can get to testing in a few days. I am slammed with overly aggressive non J2 schedules at the moment. If you do find more information in the interim, please add it to this thread.
Randy On Mon, 2006-08-28 at 08:09 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Randy, > > I will try to test on 2.1 tomorrow, even though I highly doubt migrating > to a "beta" version of J2 will make its way to prod... I so wish there > could be a "stable" release with this feature integrated already. > > Hmm.. at worst, I think there's still a way to simulate this by > duplicating the whole page and putting the correct constraints on a > page-basis. Really not flexible, but in the meantime... > > One more thing: is there a readable log of modifications brought in at > each version of J2 ? > > Thanks, > Ludovic > > > > Ludovic, > > > > Any way you can try this on the 2.1-dev/svn HEAD release? I'm a bit > > pressed for time these days, but I'll give you a hand if you still see > > the issue with 2.1-dev... yes, it should work. > > > > Randy > > > > On Fri, 2006-08-25 at 22:42 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Sorry to revive that old subject, but it looks like it's exactly the > >> problem I am encountering. Basically here's what I'm trying to achieve : > >> <page ...> > >> <security-constraints> > >> <security-constraint> > >> <groups>groupOne,groupTwo</groups> > >> <permissions>view</permissions> > >> </security-constraint> > >> </security-constraints> > >> > >> <fragment ... type="layout"> > >> <fragment ... type="portlet"> > >> <security-constraints> > >> <security-constraint> > >> <groups>groupOne</groups> > >> </security-constraint> > >> <security-constraint> > >> <groups>groupTwo</groups> > >> <permissions>groupTwo</permissions> > >> </security-constraint> > >> </security-constraints> > >> However, "groupOne" still has the rights to view the portlet... > >> > >> According to the replies, it *should* be possible, even if I am reading > >> "Note that only the view permission is checked against these > >> constraints" > >> here: > >> http://portals.apache.org/jetspeed-2/guides/guide-security-declarative-psml.html > >> Just like Randy suggested, I have upgraded to 2.0.1, but still no > >> results. > >> > >> Does anyone see something else I could try ? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Ludovic > >> > >> > >> > If you use eclipse, I suggest using the subclipse plugin... > >> > > >> > On 7/6/06, Enrique Perez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> Hi Randy, > >> >> > >> >> Ok, so I must install svn, get the source with that command you > >> pointed > >> >> me out and follow the instructions described here > >> >> (http://portals.apache.org/jetspeed-2/getting-started-source.html, > >> >> sections 5&6), mustn't I? > >> >> Is it the same for 2.1-dev?? > >> >> > >> >> Thanks a lot, > >> >> Enrique > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -----Mensaje original----- > >> >> > De: Randy Watler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> > Enviado el: miércoles, 05 de julio de 2006 16:46 > >> >> > Para: Jetspeed Users List > >> >> > Asunto: RE: Security constraints for fragments > >> >> > > >> >> > Enrique, > >> >> > > >> >> > One must build that version from source. The 2.0.1 has not been > >> pushed > >> >> > to the maven repository. Use the svn command below to pull the > >> source > >> >> > and follow the instructions on building from source on the web > >> site. > >> >> > > >> >> > HTH, > >> >> > > >> >> > Randy > >> >> > > >> >> > On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 13:29 +0200, Enrique Perez wrote: > >> >> > > Sorry Randy, > >> >> > > > >> >> > > But still don't know how to install that specific version... =S > >> >> > > I've tried to download "jetspeed plugin" (-Dversion=2.0.1) but > >> maven > >> >> is > >> >> > > unable to find it in any repository... > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Is there any getting-started-guide for this release? Any > >> >> step-by-step > >> >> > > document?? > >> >> > > > >> >> > > Thanks, > >> >> > > Enrique > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > -----Mensaje original----- > >> >> > > > De: Randy Watler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> > > > Enviado el: martes, 04 de julio de 2006 17:10 > >> >> > > > Para: Jetspeed Users List > >> >> > > > Asunto: RE: Security constraints for fragments > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > Enrique, > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/portals/jetspeed- > >> >> > > > 2/branches/JETSPEED-BRANCH-2.0.1 jetspeed-2 > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > Yes, I believe that the sizes property was broken in 2.0 as > >> well. > >> >> I > >> >> > > > think 2.0.1 fixes that as well. Nested layouts were initially > >> >> fixed in > >> >> > > > 2.0.1, but Ate put in a ton of work to make them much better in > >> >> > > 2.1-dev. > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > Randy > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 09:48 +0200, Enrique Perez wrote: > >> >> > > > > Hi Randy, > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > Where can I find the version 2.0.1?? Or how can I build that > >> >> version > >> >> > > > > with Maven 1.0.2?? Maybe modifying build.properties and > >> setting > >> >> > > > > "jetspeed.version" to the value "2.0.1"?? > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > And do you know if there is also a bug with the fragment's > >> >> property > >> >> > > for > >> >> > > > > setting the size of the columns in my version?? I mean, I'm > >> >> trying > >> >> > > to > >> >> > > > > set 20% for left column and 80% for right one with this tag: > >> >> > > > > <fragment id="x" type="layout" > >> >> > > > > name="jetspeed-layouts::VelocityTwoColumns"> > >> >> > > > > <property layout="TwoColumns" name="sizes" > >> >> > > > > value="20%,80%"/> > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > but it seems to have no effect. > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > Thanks again, > >> >> > > > > Enrique > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> > > For additional commands, e-mail: > >> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> > For additional commands, e-mail: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
