Some locations have extra unneeded IPs, some don't but I could probably get some additional IPs and and some of the locations I know it isn't possible/cost effective to get additional IPs. For the locations where I have extra public IPs I'll probably do a 1-to-1 Nat for each of them.
Christian R. Talsness On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 20:22 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Send jffnms-users mailing list submissions to > [email protected] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of jffnms-users digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: A conundrum (falz) > 2. JFFNMS Intertaces status not updating. (Meldawn) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 12:19:28 -0500 > From: falz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Reply-To: falz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [jffnms-users] A conundrum > > How many public IP's at each location? Can you NAT for each machine? > Yea, if all of the remote places are using the same private subnet, > that won't work so well. > > --falz > > > On 7/21/05, Christian Talsness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > First off I would like to commend everyone who has worked on developing t= > his > > solution. You have done a splendid job. =20 > > =20 > > Now down to business. > > =20 > > I manage several small networks at locations scattered across the US. M= > ost > > of these networks consist of a router with a public IP address doing NAT = > for > > a LAN that is using all private addresses. Monitoring the main routers > > isn't a problem, but there are several devices on the LAN that I would li= > ke > > to be able to monitor as well. Is there a way I can do this with out > > putting a satellite JFFNMS server at every location? Most of the devices= > I > > need to monitor are capable of sending SNMP traps, but I'm thinking that > > probably won't work because the traps will appear to be coming from the > > gateway router. I've also thought about establishing a VPN tunnel from m= > y > > JFFNMS server to the gateway router, but that presents the problem of > > multiple hosts having the same private IP address. Any ideas would be > > greatly appreciated. > > =20 > > Christian R. Talsness > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies fr= > om > > IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informativ= > e > > Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D7477&alloc_id=3D16492&op=3Dclick > > _______________________________________________ > > jffnms-users mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 2 > From: "Meldawn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[email protected]> > Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 16:18:49 -0700 > Subject: [jffnms-users] JFFNMS Intertaces status not updating. > > This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > ------=_NextPart_000_0274_01C58E0F.E0EAB920 > Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="US-ASCII" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > I am using the windows version of jffnms and am having trouble with > interfaces. I am adding hosts that are Cisco routers and the manually > discovering the interfaces on them. Everything looks right except that the > interfaces are not showing up/down status. They all register as being up > even if the interface is not. Any ideas? > > > > -Eric > > > -- > No virus found in this outgoing message. > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. > Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.9.2/54 - Release Date: 7/21/2005 > > > > ------=_NextPart_000_0274_01C58E0F.E0EAB920 > Content-Type: text/html; > charset="US-ASCII" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > <html xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" = > xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" = > xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40";> > > <head> > <META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; = > charset=3Dus-ascii"> > > > <meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 11 (filtered medium)"> > <style> > <!-- > /* Style Definitions */ > p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal > {margin:0in; > margin-bottom:.0001pt; > font-size:12.0pt; > font-family:"Times New Roman";} > a:link, span.MsoHyperlink > {color:blue; > text-decoration:underline;} > a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed > {color:purple; > text-decoration:underline;} > p.MsoPlainText, li.MsoPlainText, div.MsoPlainText > {margin:0in; > margin-bottom:.0001pt; > font-size:10.0pt; > font-family:"Courier New";} > p > {mso-margin-top-alt:auto; > margin-right:0in; > mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; > margin-left:0in; > font-size:12.0pt; > font-family:"Times New Roman";} > span.EmailStyle19 > {mso-style-type:personal-compose; > font-family:Arial; > color:windowtext;} > @page Section1 > {size:8.5in 11.0in; > margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in;} > div.Section1 > {page:Section1;} > --> > </style> > > </head> > > <body lang=3DEN-US link=3Dblue vlink=3Dpurple> > > <div class=3DSection1> > > <p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span = > style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; > font-family:Arial'>I am using the windows version of jffnms and am = > having > trouble with interfaces. I am adding hosts that are Cisco routers and = > the > manually discovering the interfaces on them. Everything looks right = > except that > the interfaces are not showing up/down status. They all register as = > being up > even if the interface is not. Any = > ideas?<o:p></o:p></span></font></p> > > <p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span = > style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; > font-family:Arial'><o:p> </o:p></span></font></p> > > <p class=3DMsoNormal><font size=3D2 face=3DArial><span = > style=3D'font-size:10.0pt; > font-family:Arial'>-Eric<o:p></o:p></span></font></p> > > </div> > > </body> > > </html> > <BR> > > <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>--<BR> > No virus found in this outgoing message.<BR> > Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.<BR> > Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.9.2/54 - Release Date: = > 7/21/2005<BR> > </FONT> </P> > ------=_NextPart_000_0274_01C58E0F.E0EAB920-- > > > > > --__--__-- > > _______________________________________________ > jffnms-users mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users > > > End of jffnms-users Digest ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles, informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=7477&alloc_id=16492&op=click _______________________________________________ jffnms-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jffnms-users
