I agree that accessing the end-task dialog should receive high priority in JFW
development.  Because of general stability problems in the Windows 95/98
operating system, it is not uncommon to need access to this screen.  Lacking
that access, moreover, leads to additional accessibility problems when one
cannot resolve the effects of errant applications.

Regards,
Jamal

On 1999-03-29 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
   david well i wish what you say here is true, after closeing the
   stuff on task bar and installing win fax, i ended up with a
   corrupted version of win fax, 98 will not allow me to uninstall it
   because it is corrupted, and the whole thing destroyed my
   uninstaller.
   i discovered that after running file compare.
   it also corrupted 4 other files.
   ow what i think  you fail to realize is how many things are
   actually loaded in background.
   plus it is microsoft saying use end task  before installing
   software, they are not saying just what is on the task bar.
   i have known to many bad installs and this is usually the reason.
   in fact the editors of p c world had this problem with office 97,
   in fact so many had this problem  microsoft had to rush out service
   release 1 to fix it. so if it happens with the most commonly used
   softwaare maid by major companies i am certain it is going on with
   small software companies. in fact many specify that the user use
   end task.
   bill cameron
   At 01:52 AM 3/29/99 -0500, you wrote:
   >I agree that the
   >end task menu should be accessible, but let's keep things in
   >perspective. Closing the apps on the task bar is sufficient to
   >prevent damaging your system when installing software. The only
   >time you're likely to use alt control delete is when the machine
   >locks up or won't shut down properly. In short, in's nice to have
   >but you won't use it every day. In theory you're right. The
   >operating system should be fully accessible before working on
   >individual applications. But in practice, this is not a good
   >policy. People buy computers for the applications not the OS.
   >Otherwise an inferior system like Windows wouldn't be so popular.
   >I know, for example, that I got much more use and benefit from the
   >IE4 scripts than I ever could have gotten out of being able to
   >access the end task menu. By the way, access to the internet is
   >much better with IE4 than with IE3 or Netscape. I know because
   i've used all 3 programs extensively. >
   >-
   >Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
   -
   Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net

Net-Tamer V 1.11 - Registered

-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net

Reply via email to