Here is a function that will let you know if the COM port is disabled in
CMOS...
To see if the COM ports are even recognized in DOS, use the following
routine:
1)  From a DOS command line, type "Debug".
2)  Type "e 40:0"
You should receive a "F8".
3)  Press the Spacebar once and the results should be "3".  This is the
address to COM1, 03F8.
If you get nothing but zeros, or 02F8, (COM2's address), then COM1
isn't accessible in DOS.
4)  Keep hitting the Spacebar to step through the addresses for the
remaining COM ports.  You should receive the following:
"f8", then "2":  COM2.
"E8", then "3":     COM3.
"E8", then "2":     COM4.




Thanks,
Dennis Brown, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Visit the BlindProgramming  web site at
http://brown99.home.mindspring.com

-----Original Message-----
From: Brian J. Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, March 30, 1999 6:03 PM
Subject: RE: jfw 3.2 and com ports


>Apologies if this has been resolved.  On an 486, if there is a modem in the
>system it is probably on COM2.  The port would be detected, as Windows and
>DOS look for the addresses, but the port would have to   be disabled in the
>BIOS to avoid a conflict.  This would render the physical port on the back
>of the system useless.
>
>Brian
>
>On Monday, January 01, 1990 11:09 AM, Simon F
>[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
>> Ivan
>>
>> yes the keynote sa is connected to my laptop, through comm1, and the jfw
>ver
>> is 3.2, the only other thing is that the mouse on the new machine is a
>> serial mouse and is plugged into comm1,
>>
>> this is really wierd.
>> it wont let me install my dos screen reader, as It says it can not find
>the
>> synthasizer. but yet windows and dos both see the com port.
>> -
>Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net

-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net

Reply via email to