Even Ted Henter himself admitted that this is correct, that JFW has fallen
behind. JFW 3.31 seems very likely to be a different story, but as an owner
of both screen readers, I always load Windoweyes when I want to surf the
Net, there really is no comparison at this time. i would be surprised if
many people who have access to both screen readers would disagree.
Jonathan Mosen
Listen to MBSFM with the best music from the last four decades
http://www.mbsfm.com
-----Original Message-----
From: David Poehlman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 1999 11:30 PM
To: jaws for windows mailing list
Subject: for discussion?
the below is sent so that you all will be informed of what is being
said out there and also so that those who know what is up can help set
this streight?
Editorial Corner
Window-Eyes 3.1 springs ahead of JFW 3.3 in Web access. The
latest rendition of Window-Eyes works almost seemlessly with
Internet Explorer 5.0 because of its support for Microsoft Active
Accessibility. This combo presents web pages as documents that
are temporarily stored on the user's computer. These "web
documents" are navigated and read just like other documents.
There is a "continuous read" feature which lets the user read an
entire document with a single key tap.
Window-Eyes lets the user select and then copy or cut pieces of a
web document for later use. This is a very useful feature
reminiscent of the "cut block" feature in Vocal-Eyes. But, the
selection keys are a bit nonstandard and therefore somewhat
annoying to remember.
Comments to WYFIWYG
Thanks for all the comments about the
link WWW.WYFIWYG.COM
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
