If you do upgrade, don't count on the merging of your scripts. Take it
from one that did count on it, and make a copy of any scripts that you
modified. Now, when it comes to routing the jaws cursor to the pc cursor
in IE5, I don't have any problem with that in 3.3.26.
At 09:37 AM 8/14/99 -0500, you wrote:
>Dear David,
>You wrote some real nice scripts for MONEY, my friend!
>Money works.
>I had written various people who told me that i could go to the next
>version--at this stage--3.3--and avoid the merge utility because I hadn't
>altered 3.2 that much. fine with me. but I am raising the script question,
>because I decided to wait for 3.3.1 with all its advantages since it is a
>bigger leap in functions and is coming out in October. I am hoping that beta
>testers will find your marvelous MONEY scripts and try them out in 3.3.1.
>So what about the I C Q scripts? In other words, I am hoping that beta
>testers out there--and thanks to all of them for past and future work--will
>try out the I C Q scripts in 3.3.1 when it is tested. It seems that the
>populations of JAWS users is split rather one should use the merge or should
>just use the newest software (keeping a copy of the older one on the side)
>WITHOUT MERGING. thus I am thinking ahead.
>Although this may seem out of place, please remember that no one seemed to
>find out that "RouteJAWS to PC" was messed up or absent in IE 5 during the
>beta test. Now I really liked your MONEY scripts because I like the MONEY
>program. It saved me a lot of money and time. So I hope that people who are
>kind enough to help us by doing the beta testing will try scripts--some of
>them "merging" and some of them not merging--so that answers are known. I
>am sure that some one else could have said this better.
>But I am hoping to avoid the ugly surprise that I encountered when I went
>to I E 5--e.g.: "say good bye" to "routeJAWS to PC". what a shock. And i
>want to continue to use your excellent MONEY 98 script and the I C Q script
>no matter what new version of JAWS comes down the pike.
>
>For those who can find MONEY 98, I simplified some of the functions (tech
>support for MONEY is free and lifelong) and MONEY works fine for me.
>
>have a fine day.
>----- Original Message -----
>From: David Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Friday, August 13, 1999 10:07 PM
>Subject: Re: Regarding scripts
>
>
>> Hi;
>>
>> I don't know if what I am about to say works in all cases but I haven't
>> found an exception yet. I have posted some scripts with Nick. Namely
>> MSMoney98 WP61and a couple others. When I sent them to Nick JFW 3.30 was
>> not released so naturally they are posted on the page for JFW 3.2.
>> However, they all work with JFW3.30 as well or better than they did with
>> the older versions. I do not find any reason not to put scripts from the
>> JFW 3.2 page into newer versions of JFW. Going the other way may cause a
>> few problems because of new scripting functions in the newer versions of
>JFW.
>>
>> As I said at the beginning I am reporting my personal experience. Others
>> may differ with me. So be it. {;-) Grin
>>
>> David Maynard
>> Franklin NC
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> At 07:54 PM 8/13/99 -0500 Tusing Wrote:
>> Greetings,
>> A recent poster to this list suggested that the I C Q scripts were JAWS
>3.2
>> scripts--and to use them with 3.3.026-- one had to put the scripts onto
>3.2,
>> add 3.3026 and then do the merge. Well, what if one tries those I C Q
>> scripts with 3.3026? and since we will soon get 3.3.1, I am sure people
>> will still want to use I C Q with 3.3.1. What I am suggesting is that this
>> script thing needs to be better explained.
>>
>> also, I was one of the people who used the MONEY 98 scripts. For me, MONEY
>> 98 works just fine. Does the situation implied in the previous paragraph
>> apply to those MONEY 98 scripts? Are the MONEY 98 scripts only for 3.2; or
>> will they work with 3.3 (if you don't merge)? Will they work with 3.3.1?
>Of
>> course no one knows anything about 3.3.1. but my point is that the need
>for
>> scripts is universal. People will want to use MONEY and enjoy usingI C Q.
>>
>> I raise this issue for those gifted beta testers out there (whoever they
>> are) so that this script situation will become much more understandable
>> when 3.3.1 arrives.
>>
>> Also to those spanish users, please will any of you be serving as beta
>> testers for 3.3.1?
>>
>> If any one is using 3.3.026 with the I C Q scripts (and you did not merge
>> 3.2 and 3.3) and the I C Q works, write me "off list".
>>
>> thanks in advance
>>
>> -
>> Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>>
>>
>> -
>> Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>>
>
>-
>Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>
>
Walter
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
