letely agree. What's also a pain is that the serial munbers aren't in order.
I can't quite use the find command so looking thru all them not to find your
numbeer was quite the waste if time.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dave Csercsics <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thursday, December 23, 1999 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: the case of the missing serial number
>Yeah I'll agree with you jJeff, this is the worst behaviour I have ever
seen
>from ANY company. I would like to know what the idea is behind some of HJ's
>policies particularly the "public beta" definition! This doesn't make any
>sense to me at all!
>Dave Csercsics,
>Simba or Zemballa on irc,
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jeff Paget" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, December 23, 1999 7:15 AM
>Subject: Re: the case of the missing serial number
>
>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> Quotes on.
>> On Wed, 22 Dec 1999, Dale Reardon wrote:
>>
>> > I have the same problem. Who is meant to be able to use the program?
A
>> > very strange use of the word public beta. When other companies release
>> > public betas that means the whole public can use it.
>> Quotes off.
>>
>> A "public beta" release of a program is supposed to give everyone
>> who has an interest in a program a chance to evaluate and comment
>> on a forthcomming release, obviously this is not the intent from
>> Henter Joyce.
>>
>> By limiting the release to those who have still have "upgrade"
>> status no-one with a previous release will be able to update
>> their earlier version without first paying another fee.
>>
>> If Ted Henter deserves an award for this sort of behaviour I'll
>> start believing in the tooth fairy.
>>
>> Regards Jeff
>>
>>
>> -
>> Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>>
>
>-
>Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
>
>
-
Visit the jfw ml web page: http://jfw.cjb.net
