+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ Dr Thakur, 1. Make sure you have posted it at right address ie, [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [email protected]
2. Make sure it is sent - Go to your email's sent messages folder, that records all your sent messages. 3. If its there (sent messages folder) then have patience for few hours until its passed by Mr/Ms Moderator. If it did not appear in this Forum after 8 hours of actual posted time means your message is moderated. In exceptional cases, messages are auto delayed up to 10 to 20 minutes. Note - Internal database keep records of all rejected or not approved message, and this message is not there means you have not sent it to JF. Regards, JF Moderator +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ On 4 Sep 2008 10:11:31 -0000, Dr Dhanakar Thakur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I do not know why my reply was not released on mail- is anything derogatory > to anyone in it? > Dhanakar > > > Wed, 03 Sep 2008 15:40:22 IST > > > Cc: "Kundan Kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Note: To help protect your privacy, images from this message > have been blocked.View images | What is this? > > > > > > > > Gujarat and Orissa and whereever the BJP is in power they should used lawful > means to stop conversions. > Conversion issue directly lead to violence because now Hindus retaliate. > > > Killed Swamiji will not bring Naxalism or killing Stain will not stop > conversion. > > Genocides caused through religion across historyand truly hinduism has been > more tolerant and assimilative then the semitic faiths such as christianity > and Islam. > One should criticize all wrongs like Kashmiri pundits were thwatred out in > this age and so from Bangladesh Hindu killing reported every year. > > Hindus have onus of nation building but saying about a pluralistic, diverse > society into a society with a common identity, is difficult to achieve > unless minorities feel that majority hve also a view. > > Only saying 'modern times, no state can be build purely on religions faith > or on identity politics' cannot subverse the wrongs. > > -Calling "a nation that is so diverse and pluralistic," does not deter the > view that the culture of India is in fact Hindu and that should not be > barred from reflection as already Muslims have got 36 per cent of Indian > land despite having only 12 per cent population in 1947. > So the persons who talk for pluralistic colurs should first ask for > unification of the country and t least any Muslim shoud not ask for any > privilege even if Hindus are given something though opposite we are seeing > in the country. > > Where Hindus are in minority there they are tortured like Kashmir or > Kerala- so whether all saintly talks are for Hindus. > > The framers of our constitution had understood this very well and in fact > had made Constitution for United India frm which Muslims walked out barring > a few Congressi. > > What has happened to Pakistan will happen to India if Hindus are reduced in > minority. > > . While we cannot afford a nation and polity based on hatred and exclusion > we can also not afford for marginalising majority Hindus. > > Maoists will be rejected by the vast majority of Indian people,and so people > who hate Hindu ethos. > > > We must follow the rule of law; and change the laws where they are unjust or > impractical- stop HAJ SUBSIDY..STOP MINORITY COLLEGES,,,a medical college is > not needed to teach Islam , Abrogate article 370.. > > > Courts are not the answers for friends who feel that christian missionaries > are unfairly "converting" adivasies to christianity are welcome to go to the > courts;rathr they should go to jungles and work hard with SARNA people. > > The increasing economic divide and the frustration among unemployed youth > finds an outlet in such violence is not true assertion. > > Religious fundamentalism and intolerance by the minority community is the > greatest threat to the Indian nation, its constitution and our democracy not > by the majorities who are almost silent. > > Dr. Dhanakar Thakur > > > > > > > > On Thu, 04 Sep 2008 sri venkat wrote : >>Social service done by the missionaries is laudable. >> >>But why do you have to convert? Why does one have to sell one's soul? >>Is that ethical? And what if we do not convert? Are we are deprived >>of social services? >
