Well said Kundan, though I understand that your time limitations (unlike
those who are employed to do only email work 24 x 7 to propagte religious
intolerance) are not permitting you to go into the details of the social
conflict existing in Kandhamal). In between, the attack orchestrated by
Bajrangdal yesterday was at Sisapanga village and on tribal Christians -
where more than 100 houses have been destroyed and 2 churches burnt down.

By the way I am quite surprised by the sense of prejudice and intolerance
shown by some of the group members in responding to an invite to a FFM
report release (all the more interesting as none of the group members who
jumped at it had accesss to the report or the process). This shows the
levels of intolerance and the psyche not to treat anything on merrit, but
prejudice...!!!

Though I do not believe that my views or any level of proving the truth will
not change the opinion of self-employed email workers who are flooding the
group with hate campaign, let me dare to put some facts right:

1. Reg 'foreign funding': *a) *Foreign funding under FCRA rules are no
'hawala funding', they are very much legal and monitored by the Home
Ministry of the country, which brings out an annual report on the amounts
received by various agencies/NGOs from foreign donors. Each and every penny
received by any of these organisations is also monitored by the RBI *b) *the
Govt of India is the receiver of biggest foreign contributions (including
from NGOs abroad - and interestingly during the BJP regime, it hit an all
time high), *c) *The funding by Christian organisations from the West, which
used to be a high percentage of India's foreign funding has come down by
more than 60% and is only less than 10% of total amounts received by NGOs in
India - this was not because anyone stopped them from funding in India, it
was because of their policy changes, *d) *Some of the activist groups we
know have been demanding that the FCRA dept in MHA should be brought under
the RTI Act (an idea itself opposed by BJP), so that the income of any and
every organisation is accessible for any citizen of India,* now most
importantly e) a lion's share of foreign-funding received from US,
UK, Canada, Germany, Australia and Israel are going to organisations that
are wings of / have openly allied themselves to Sangh Parivar and its
propaganda, f) *The FCRA/SRA organisations do have a set of objectives, a
constitution and an open system of audit *& g)* Political parties are
fobidden from receiving foreign funds for any activity - which is why
several of the NDA and UPA ministers and party leaders of BJP and Congress
bring back hard cash in dollars after their foreign trips. The Delhi airport
authorities had caught two BJP office-bearers and a Bajrangi fellow for
carrying more than a lakh in dollar (each) - in the year 2002, but did not
register any case because calls came from Advani's office (then Minister of
Home and Deputy PM). One should also remeber this in the context of a
low-caste leader of BJP sacked for accepting one lakh rupees, ie. less than
1/120th of what these smugglers had got into India illegally and in the
context of Mayawati's diamonds becoming the victim of ridicule  of every 
political joke in
Indian upper-caste media.

Regarding 'SPY' issue, let us not underestimate organisations like IB
& Research and Analysis Wing...!!!

2. It is clear that in an election year, the Sanghis are more afraid of
Dalits than any section of the Indian society. It is evident from both their
political rhetorics and their violent/ce initiations. They are willing to
even ignore the minorities and the lefties (marxists/maoists) for the time
being. The attack on vulnerable (read Christian/Muslim) Dalits in some
select corners of states ruled by them clarifies this intent. The secret
among investigative journalists is even that BJP leadership had meetings
with Orissa VHP and Bajrangdal just weeks before Swami's murder...
In most of the states where anti-conversion law has been brought in, they
are mostly serving the purpose when Dalits and Tribals want to convert to
Budhism/Christianity or Islam and not when the Sanghi's run their
'Ghar-Wapsi' campaign (Vanvasi Kalyan Ashram is funded for this)

3. There is an argument about foreign-missionaries being stopped from
engaging in missionary activities, etc. They are also threatened then with
the language of violence. I was just wondering what will be our reaction
when the more than 60,000 odd South Asian 'volunteers' of several Hindu (not
neccesarily Hindutva) organisations like Ramakrishna mission or ISKON, Arya
Samaj or Vivekananda mission, etc will be attacked or killed by the
Christian fascists or the Muslim ones in their countries, where these people
have been actively engaged in religious conversions and 'adoption' to
Hinduism??? Just heard the term 'HYPOCRISY'...

4. The killing of Graham Steins was as bad as if someone had killed Mother
Teresa for proselytisation activities. The man was a threat to the
communal/fascist/feudal forces not because he converted people to
Cristianity (which he never did), but he taught them to read and write, to
be aware of their rights as citizens and to challenge when their natural
resources where taken away by companies and corporates with help from the
political establishment. That was the same reason why the BJP-Congress
goonds had assassinated Com. Shankar Guha Niyogi or the police had
selectively killed Fr. Antony Murmu or the Congress had targetted leading
theatre artist, Com. Safdar Hashmi. For more or less the same reasons, the
RSS wanted to and managed to eliminate Mahatma Gandhi !!!!!!!!

For those who are intersted in a sensible debate on Foreign funding, kindly
find an earlier mail from Mr. Anil below. He wrote this when the foreign
funding argument was raised against Chengara Land Struggle in Kerala by the
CPM and also the right-wing...

regards,

vijayan

-- 

Anil (Jharkhand Forum)wrote: I think it is important to challenge some of the 
misconceptions prevalent in "intellectuals" about apparent paranoia about the 
so-called "Foreign" funding and "vested interest of NGOs". 
The issues( like Chengara) needs to be addressed with a sense of political 
maturity and public policy options- not by knee jerk reaction and the so-called 
" press expose" to bark at the wrong trees.. Simply by pointing fingers to any 
NGOs will not help anyone , other than distracting attention from the real 
issue. 
- With regard to the issue of " foreign" funding  , less said the better many 
of the most important Organizations and academic institutions( including the 
National Law School were actually initiated and strengthen with International 
Support, including grants from the Ford Foundation. Institutions like TISS, 
TIFR and IISc were also initiated and strengthened with the grants from Tata 
Trust and international organizations. 
I work in an NGO and our organization have openly , unapologetically and 
assertively  taken international support from responsible organizations  to 
initiate and build some of the most credible organizations in this country- and 
supported by  some of the most credible people in our country- including those 
from the Left . We are legitimately proud about the contributions of such 
organizations and initiatives.  Some of people in NGOs have also been part of 
the initiatives to promote public accountability of all those governmental and 
non-governmental organizations that receive money from public or private 
sources. It is one thing to seek Transparency and Accountability of all those 
who received funds from governmental and non-governmental sources and it is an 
entirely different thing to questions the  very legitimacy of citizens 
associated with such organizations to speak up for social justice or human 
rights. All these information are very much in the public domain. 
All of these are done in a very transparent, accountable, conscientious  and 
responsible manner, and in our capacity as the committed citizens of this 
country - with courage of conviction  and will continue to do so as long as 
India is a free country, with a Constitution.  Just because a Narendra Modi, 
Sangh Parivar or few other actors with vested political interest  cry foul , 
citizens of this county do  not need to  keep quite and will asset and claim 
ones fundamental rights to association, and expression at any cost.. It is high 
time for organizations and people to be open and assertive about it. It is 
plain and simple. 
"Yeh, desh kisi ka baap/ maa ka desh nahi hai!! Sab ka desh hai!" 
  As citizens of  an Independent India, such initiatives to improve society and 
polity are a part of our moral and political responsibility. 
"Gandhi did receive support from different sources, including Tata, and few 
wealthy German people........for the struggle

Reply via email to