Does anyone know if JiBX developers monitor this list?

Also, in general I'm wondering if anyone has experiences to share in
terms of level of support for JiBX. Let me start by saying I understand
that this is an open source project and I am fully appreciative of the
willingness of others to share the fruit of their efforts. That said,
the amount of support available simply has to be a criteria for me in
deciding whether to use a product and in the week or so I've been on
this mailing list, I've seen only questions. I think I've only seen one
person actually answer a question and that makes me a little nervous
when we're about to undertake a large effort with JiBX as one of the key
pieces.

I would have thought my question would be a no-brainer for someone on
the dev team to answer even if the answer is just "I don't know", but I
haven't seen any response at all.

Bill Bailey


On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 22:09:59 -0500, "Bill Bailey"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi,
> 
> I noticed several references to newer versions on the web site,
> including 1.2 and 2.0. It appears that the first beta version of 1.2 was
> initially planned for Jan 2007, but since it doesn't yet appear for
> download I am guessing this didn't happen per the original schedule.
> There is reference to version 2.0 being available initially in Apr 2007,
> but no further updates that I could find.
> 
> Can someone provide an update regarding when each of these releases is
> expected to be available?
> 
> In particular, I'm interested in some of the features that allow code
> and binding mapping generation from an XML Schema. We are planning to
> use Spring Web Services which follows a contract first approach,
> beginning with the XML Schema. Although I have found the documentation
> on the binding mappings quite good, we are a small shop (less than 3
> full time developers) and any tools that can make us more productive
> (i.e. less hand written code) is a good thing. I like the concept of
> using the XML Schema to initially generate the Java code and mapping,
> but still having the ability to modify both the XML Schema and Java code
> as needed as the design evolves, but it appears the separate beta
> versions of these tools may not be ready for prime time. Any comments on
> what the approach might be in the interim? Until the full set of tools
> is available in 1.2 or 2.0?
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> Bill Bailey
> Senior Developer / DBA
> Northland, A Church Distributed
> ------------------------------
> --  Bill Bailey             --
> --  [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
> ------------------------------ 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> jibx-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
------------------------------
--  Bill Bailey             --
--  [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
------------------------------ 


-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
jibx-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users

Reply via email to