kirktrue commented on code in PR #14406:
URL: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/14406#discussion_r1346546088
##########
clients/src/main/java/org/apache/kafka/clients/consumer/internals/PrototypeAsyncConsumer.java:
##########
@@ -621,56 +825,174 @@ public void assign(Collection<TopicPartition>
partitions) {
throw new IllegalArgumentException("Topic partitions to assign
to cannot have null or empty topic");
}
- // TODO: implementation of refactored Fetcher will be included in
forthcoming commits.
- // fetcher.clearBufferedDataForUnassignedPartitions(partitions);
+ // Clear the buffered data which are not a part of newly assigned
topics
+ final Set<TopicPartition> currentTopicPartitions = new HashSet<>();
+
+ for (TopicPartition tp : subscriptions.assignedPartitions()) {
+ if (partitions.contains(tp))
+ currentTopicPartitions.add(tp);
+ }
+
+ fetchBuffer.retainAll(currentTopicPartitions);
- // assignment change event will trigger autocommit if it is configured
and the group id is specified. This is
- // to make sure offsets of topic partitions the consumer is
unsubscribing from are committed since there will
- // be no following rebalance
- eventHandler.add(new
AssignmentChangeApplicationEvent(this.subscriptions.allConsumed(),
time.milliseconds()));
+ // make sure the offsets of topic partitions the consumer is
unsubscribing from
+ // are committed since there will be no following rebalance
+ applicationEventHandler.add(new
AssignmentChangeApplicationEvent(this.subscriptions.allConsumed(),
time.milliseconds()));
log.info("Assigned to partition(s): {}", join(partitions, ", "));
if (this.subscriptions.assignFromUser(new HashSet<>(partitions)))
- eventHandler.add(new NewTopicsMetadataUpdateRequestEvent());
+ applicationEventHandler.add(new
NewTopicsMetadataUpdateRequestEvent());
}
@Override
- public void subscribe(Pattern pattern, ConsumerRebalanceListener callback)
{
- throw new KafkaException("method not implemented");
+ public void subscribe(Pattern pattern, ConsumerRebalanceListener listener)
{
+ maybeThrowInvalidGroupIdException();
+ if (pattern == null || pattern.toString().isEmpty())
+ throw new IllegalArgumentException("Topic pattern to subscribe to
cannot be " + (pattern == null ?
+ "null" : "empty"));
+
+ throwIfNoAssignorsConfigured();
+ log.info("Subscribed to pattern: '{}'", pattern);
+ this.subscriptions.subscribe(pattern, listener);
+ this.updatePatternSubscription(metadata.fetch());
+ this.metadata.requestUpdateForNewTopics();
+ }
+
+ /**
+ * TODO: remove this when we implement the KIP-848 protocol.
+ *
+ * <p>
+ * The contents of this method are shamelessly stolen from
+ * {@link ConsumerCoordinator#updatePatternSubscription(Cluster)} and are
used here because we won't have access
+ * to a {@link ConsumerCoordinator} in this code. Perhaps it could be
moved to a ConsumerUtils class?
+ *
+ * @param cluster Cluster from which we get the topics
+ */
+ private void updatePatternSubscription(Cluster cluster) {
+ final Set<String> topicsToSubscribe = cluster.topics().stream()
+ .filter(subscriptions::matchesSubscribedPattern)
+ .collect(Collectors.toSet());
+ if (subscriptions.subscribeFromPattern(topicsToSubscribe))
+ metadata.requestUpdateForNewTopics();
}
@Override
public void subscribe(Pattern pattern) {
- throw new KafkaException("method not implemented");
+ subscribe(pattern, new NoOpConsumerRebalanceListener());
}
@Override
public void unsubscribe() {
- throw new KafkaException("method not implemented");
+ fetchBuffer.retainAll(Collections.emptySet());
+ this.subscriptions.unsubscribe();
}
@Override
@Deprecated
- public ConsumerRecords<K, V> poll(long timeout) {
- throw new KafkaException("method not implemented");
+ public ConsumerRecords<K, V> poll(final long timeoutMs) {
+ return poll(Duration.ofMillis(timeoutMs));
}
// Visible for testing
WakeupTrigger wakeupTrigger() {
return wakeupTrigger;
}
- private static <K, V> ClusterResourceListeners
configureClusterResourceListeners(
- final Deserializer<K> keyDeserializer,
- final Deserializer<V> valueDeserializer,
- final List<?>... candidateLists) {
- ClusterResourceListeners clusterResourceListeners = new
ClusterResourceListeners();
- for (List<?> candidateList: candidateLists)
- clusterResourceListeners.maybeAddAll(candidateList);
+ /**
+ * Send the requests for fetch data to the background thread and set up to
collect the results in
+ * {@link #fetchResults}.
+ */
+ private void sendFetches() {
+ FetchEvent event = new FetchEvent();
+ applicationEventHandler.add(event);
+
+ event.future().whenComplete((completedFetches, error) -> {
+ if (error != null)
+ log.warn("An error occurred during poll: {}",
error.getMessage(), error);
+ else
+ fetchResults.addAll(completedFetches);
+ });
+ }
+
+ private Fetch<K, V> pollForFetches(Timer timer) {
+ long pollTimeout = timer.remainingMs();
+
+ // if data is available already, return it immediately
+ final Fetch<K, V> fetch = fetchCollector.collectFetch(fetchBuffer);
+ if (!fetch.isEmpty()) {
+ return fetch;
+ }
+
+ // send any new fetches (won't resend pending fetches)
+ sendFetches();
+
+ // We do not want to be stuck blocking in poll if we are missing some
positions
+ // since the offset lookup may be backing off after a failure
+
+ // NOTE: the use of cachedSubscriptionHasAllFetchPositions means we
MUST call
+ // updateAssignmentMetadataIfNeeded before this method.
+ if (!cachedSubscriptionHasAllFetchPositions && pollTimeout >
retryBackoffMs) {
+ pollTimeout = retryBackoffMs;
+ }
+
+ log.trace("Polling for fetches with timeout {}", pollTimeout);
+
+ Timer pollTimer = time.timer(pollTimeout);
+
+ // Attempt to fetch any data. It's OK if we don't have any waiting
data here; it's a 'best case' effort. The
+ // data may not be immediately available, but the calling method
(poll) will correctly
+ // handle the overall timeout.
+ try {
+ while (pollTimer.notExpired()) {
+ CompletedFetch completedFetch =
fetchResults.poll(pollTimer.remainingMs(), TimeUnit.MILLISECONDS);
+
+ if (completedFetch != null)
+ fetchBuffer.add(completedFetch);
Review Comment:
Yes, I can see that now. Given that there are two separate `FetchBuffer`s
and the way they're populated, I think the window is actually a bit bigger.
I need to noodle on this for a bit.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]
