erland;486224 Wrote: > Unfortunately I think the desktop version of SqueezePlay is where it > shows it's strengths least. It's not really built for mouse and desktop > usage at the moment. It has been improved a bit since the Touch > implementation but it still has a long way to go. Scrolling on a touch screen is cumbersome, yes, and the "everything goes into the home menu" approach doesn't help here. On the contrary, we need more hierarchical menus where each level has only as many entries as can be displayed on the screen at the same time. But apart from that, operating the software works surprisingly well for something that accomodates a touch screen, knobs, buttons, a mouse, and a keyboard all at the same time.
However, that's not my main concern, but ... erland;486224 Wrote: > SqueezePlay can still be used in the same way as SqueezePlay to try the > system before purchasing. ... this is where SqueezePlay totally fails. :( I would return any device that is so full of bugs. Bear in mind that as a potential buyer I cannot tell whether a bug is only in the desktop version or in the actual product, too. The biggest issues at the moment are that it plays files at the wrong speed, I cannot synchronize it to any of my other players, and I can only control it from the web interface because it does not appear in its own "select player" menu. I really would not want to buy something like that. -- usch ------------------------------------------------------------------------ usch's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=33389 View this thread: http://forums.slimdevices.com/showthread.php?t=71469 _______________________________________________ jive mailing list [email protected] http://lists.slimdevices.com/mailman/listinfo/jive
