I'd have to agree with sebastian. package level properties would be nice and reduce the number of files to update and change. especially with internationalization. peter lin
"BAZLEY, Sebastian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Is the idea to move all the Bean-related properties from messages.properties to Resources.properties? It seems to me that this will result in a lot of property files to create, translate, test and maintain. I can see that it is useful to be able to have more than one set of property files, but one set per class is rather a lot - would it be possible to combine these in sets at the package (or some parent package) level? Just a thought ... S --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Hotjobs: Enter the "Signing Bonus" Sweepstakes
