Hi Scott, > Can you please clarify the motivation for your query? Are you promoting a > "no patches without test cases" philosophy or is there something special > about this particular change that concerns you?
I'm aware of reproducing thread related errors. I also trust Jonathan and you, my point was that this error was happening to me, but when I tried to find and fix that I always failed to reproduce it no matter how much threads, loops, assertions etc I had in test. From Jonathan's emails I suspected he has such sort of test. As far as "no patches without test cases" philosophy is concerned, I think it's good to know that somebody checked that before commiting. I mean I would be anxious about commiting my own patch without knowing it works for someone else. Of course I'm aware of difficulties in testing thread-related patches. best regards Michal Kostrzewa -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
