Egon, I'm worried I detect sarcasm in that message. Just asking for clarification.
Bob Egon Willighagen wrote: > cc: cdk-devel > > On Sun, Mar 23, 2008 at 2:08 PM, Geoffrey Hutchison > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Mar 23, 2008, at 2:16 AM, Egon Willighagen wrote: >> > Unless this would happen... though this would require everyone who >> > every contributed to the code to agree with this, including the >> > authors of the original babel code, >> >> Tim and I have already explicitly stated our approval that LGPL is >> fine for the force field classes. I believe the jmol-developers list >> may have bounced that message since I'm not a member of the list. >> > > I haven't seen a bounce message... > > >> There's no need to worry about the "authors of the original babel >> code." The force field classes are highly self-contained. Bob has >> essentially taken just the bits that Tim and I (and mostly Tim) added >> to Open Babel. >> > > Oh, really? I am really happy to hear that! I'm sure the CDK will have > a close look at the code too then! > > Egon > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Jmol-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-developers
