Nick Greeves wrote:
Molecular structures is not accurate. Bob uses quartz as an example, there are lovely pages showing zeolites, graphite, diamond, ionic solids e.g. NaCl, metals, etc. etc. _*These are not molecules but they are chemicals*_.
Am I missing something?!
I don't think we should accept the idea that chemical is a "dirty" word. It is widely understood and appropriate.I dont't think this discussion should be about how clean chemistry is but the more appropriate way to describe what Jmol does and how it can be used.
How about "Jmol - an open-source Java viewer for three-dimensional chemical and biological structures" ?
A hand, a wing, a hair... they are all biological structures. Again, I think this discussion shouldn't be about chemistry vs biology.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________ Jmol-users mailing list Jmol-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users
