p.s. Of course I must apologize for that overly emotional response. Not a good
day around here.

mags.

"Jim L'Hommedieu (Lama)" wrote:

> Funny as it may seem, I agree with ya Mags.  Activism is great and one of
> the key strengths of social democracies like Canada, the UK, and the US.
> (And, I think NZ, Australia, and Austria too?)  I apologize, as a straight
> person, for weighing in on a gay issue.  Maybe it's not my place.
>
> That said, my take is that his sexuality is his own business, not his
> employers.  Politically, he can balance his priorites and isn't
> automatically required to take up any cause that might be more
> self-destructive than effective.  It seems, remarkably, that we are all
> saying the same thing.  (?)
>
> I've been away for the weekend so I apologize for replying late.
>
> Lama
>
> > From: Mags [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Mags said,
> > when I read this, I could not help but be reminded of
> > a phrase that was central to my feminist politics
> > courses at York University, a phrase which made so
> > much sense to me, then and now, a phrase which is
> > woven in to the very fabric of my life, still...
> >
> > "the personal is political"
> >
> >  for some people, the aforementioned phrase has moved
> > them to effect change not only in their own life, but
> > in the life of others.
> >
> > Mags
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > Lama wrote to Mack:
> >
> > <<You are there for your parents, not for political
> > reform.  Bedroom politics
> > don't belong in the Personnel Office, right?>>

--
And this loving is a drawing close,
a tuning in, an opening.
Until one perfect moment;
but how can it be expressed?
A receiving, an enfolding
as I cradle you in my arms.
Within my heart, within my soul,
You are my true love.

     --Lui Collins

---

                  _~O
                 / /\_,
               ___/\
                   /_

Reply via email to