Would the Joni-only people rather get njc mail by mistake sometimes, or miss Joni talk when people forget the label? I dunno, I'm on the 'everything' version. RR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > 2) from a technical POV, what would fix this is all content assumed to be NJC > unless specified otherwise. That way, instead of an "NJC" tag, we would put > a "JC" tag on anything with Joni content. I think that would eliminate the > "false positive" Joni content. But then you'd have the other problem; some > JC would go unlabeled because people would forget. what do all of you think > about this? > > Mary K
