i've just come back from a dinner party. we had the most fantastic
conversation on precisely this topic. walt, had i read your post before i
left, i would have had a MAJOR, KICK-ASS new concept to share with my
friends: fluid sexuality.

sexuality, the nature of desire, the formation AND the realization AND the
actualization of a sexual identity have been THE central issues in my
personal anthropological research for the last ten years or so. i've dated
all 57 heinz varieties yet i know nothing.

this evening we were five at the table: a married couple, parents of four
children; a woman of forty who vowed chastity twenty years ago in order to
consecrate herself to a mutually consented platonic partnership with a roman
catholic priest; a gay man who had, between partnerships with males, a
5-year relationship with a woman; and i, a gay man with no significant
romantic or sexual liaisons with women in my past. i wish you had been
there. the diversity of backgrounds, the wealth of perspectives, and the
candor of the narratives: what a memorable evening.

i have no answers. some people seem to be ''sexually fluid'', some people
seem to be confused or simply cowardly, and yet some people seem to undergo
a process of actualization of a potential sexuality. from what i heard
tonight, from what i've been hearing in the last decade, people are
potentially ANYthing. in some cases events seem to trigger the actualization
of some potential aspect or other. in other cases, we know from minute one
who and what and where we are. a man may marry and have five children and
then meet another man and move in with him. he'll put on leather gear and a
dog collar. he may or may not take it off when his grandchildren come to
visit. this hypothetical man, who was married for 10, 20, 30 years, had an
erection every single time he wanted to have sex with his wife. his wife's
skin is a woman's skin. she has a vagina. she has a woman's smell. this very
same man loves to give head: he is turned on by the feel, the sight of
another man's beard/legs/butt/cock. how can he be turned on by such diverse
stimuli? are these stimuli mutually exclusive? can a man synchronously and
genuinely be turned on by ''womanliness'' and ''manliness''?

and i haven't even begun to discuss women yet!

so many questions, so much pleasure in one's quest for answers.

wally

Reply via email to