Deb and Vince, I'll try to find the legal analysis I read - it was very interesting and exhaustively cited both the Constitution and Roe v. Wade to support its conclusion. I hate to try remember the legal gist of it without reading it again, but there seems to be something inherent in the Roe v. Wade decision which prevents *any* court from overturning it. The analysis said that *maybe* a president/executive action alone could overturn it, but even then, there were, arguably, provisions in the Constitution which would preclude that.
Kakki
