It's amazing to me that you two are so quick to make accusations yet apparently won't even read the link I posted from the National Review. I read and listen from all sources including NPR and the anti-republican ones just to see what everyone's input is. The National Review article is extemely factual and cites hard evidence long available publically. You just reveal your bias not to consider looking at anything that may disprove your allegations, which is fine, I suppose, but I don't understand why, if you are sincerely concerned about the issue you will not look an objective analysis of the actual evidence (and a link to the documents themselves). You might be surprised at what it has to say.
Kakki
