Andrew wrote>Generally, there is no difference between lyrics and
poems, except that lyrics are traditionally sung and poems are either
read silently or spoken. Would the words of a poem become lyrics if
they are sung? I'm not sure. There was an album tribute to
Shakespeare recently with songs by Rufus Wainright that changed
Sonnet 39 into a song. Do lyrics become poems when they are written
on a page? Again, I don't really know. "The Complete Poems and
Lyrics" seems to indicate that they can.
Franklin> I beg to differ, Andrew. There is a WORLD of difference
between a lyricist and a poet. The term lyricist would imply someone
who is addressing the specific needs of a song - generally three
(rarely four) chords meant to charm 16.00 out of a 14-25 year old.
Repetition, hooks, "catchy" chorus are all part of the "game".
The test is can the words to the song be recited, without blush or
embarrassment on the part of the writer, sans music and melody.
There is a very distinctive word for one who writes poetry and can
successfully put it to music. It's called prosody, and in literature
it is the ONLY literary form considered higher than actual poetry.
Here is an example of what I mean: Bob Dylan appeared on David
Letterman a few months ago and sang a song. It was laden with
repetition ad nauseum. Now it is common industry knowledge that
appearing on David Letterman will generally boost the sales of
whatever artist's CD by 45-80,000 copies a week for two weeks - this
is a Soundscan proven fact. Now if Letterman were to ask Bob Dylan,
"Bob, I know that you've made x-amount of millions from performance
royalties (radio) off of this song, and that this broadcast will give
a significant "bump" to your current sales. So kindly, will you
recite the lyrics to this otherwise rather pedestrian, three chord
song for us all so weh can better understand what makes it so
valuable before you perform it?"
I GUARANTEE you, flat out, that Dylan would immediately walk off that
stage - he'd be WAY to embarrassed to recite those lyrics naked
(without music) - thus, he qualifies a lyricist. Now, not that that's
good or bad (wink) but it is simply a fact. So the true test of poet
vs. lyricist is IMO, can they, without blush or embarrassment,
without dropping ANY of multiple repetitious "repeater" chorus lines,
etc.,(in other words, the entire lyrics to the song) stand with a
straight face and recite the lyrics alone to applause and
appreciation. This is musical poetry, or (once again, there is
actually a term for it) prosody.
The dictionary I have defines prosody as "poetical words and thoughts
combined with melody,in such a manner as to SUCCESSFULLY lend further
emotional significance to the poetry." That is why prosody is SO
difficult. If you already have a beautiful poem - melody/music can
only do one of two things to/for it: it can either detract from it,
or enhance it - there is no middle ground, no other option. That is
also why it is considered the ONLY literary form ABOVE poetry. A far
more eloquent definition I have found is "Lyrical poetry, when viewed
correctly, is the inevitable creation of the peers of all great
prosody: words, thoughts, and melody. It is through poetry that
thought becomes music's most elegant benefactor, as a song is born."-
L.A. Cowboy. Copied from L.A. Cowboy's mp3 site at
http://www.mp3.com/lacowboy
There are virtually no pure prosodists working in CONTEMPORARY music
today to my knowledge, with the notable exception of L.A. Cowboy.
Every intellectual (University English professor type) I know (I
teach, among other things), familiar with his work acknowledges this.
Andrew> You'd probably have to consult a book of poetry rules for the
answer, and there are many rules to the various different kinds of
poetry, from iambic pentameter to odes, villanelles to limericks,
haiku, sonnets and rhyming couplets.
Franklin> No need for the book of poetry rules - just take any song
you appreciate and recite the ENTIRE lyrical contents of the song as
if it were a bona fide, inspired (all poetry is assumedly inspired -
that's what makes true poets through the ages so prominent) poem.
You'll instantly know whether you are dealing with a lyricist or a
poet - and there is a literary WORLD OF DIFFERENCE between the two.
Cordially, Franklin
NP: L.A. Cowboy - "Farewell"
"The crown of literature is poetry. It is its end and aim. It is the
sublimest activity of the human mind. It is the achievement of beauty
and delicacy. The writer of prose can only step aside when the poet
passes." W. Somerset Maugham
Taken from the inside cover of the first L.A. Cowboy CD - "Farewell".
A timeless "prosodic" classic from front to back - 100% certified
"filler-free".
- Re: Lyricists as poets??? Franklin Shea
- Re: Lyricists as poets??? David Marine
- Re: Lyricists as poets??? Susan Guzzi
- Re: NJC Lyricists as poets??? Victor Johnson
- Re: NJC Lyricists as poets??? Victor Johnson
- Re: NJC Lyricists as poets??? Bill Dollinger
- Re: NJC Lyricists as poets??? Franklin Shea
- Re: NJC Lyricists as poets??? Victor Johnson
- Re: NJC Lyricists as poets??? Franklin Shea
- NJC Lyricists as poets??? Kate Bennett