Hi Lukas, What I'm trying to say is, it may be worth evaluating to write scooq, > instead of adding 1-2 utilities to jOOQ. Or since Scala is mainly > functional, not OO, a "better" name might be scfq ;-) >
Remember that Java 8 is coming and you may have to think of "jFQ" too :) Cheers, -Christopher -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
