Hi Nicholas, 2013/8/7 Nicholas Ustinov <[email protected]>
> Hi! > > What I'm trying to say is, it may be worth evaluating to write scooq, >> instead of adding 1-2 utilities to jOOQ. Or since Scala is mainly >> functional, not OO, a "better" name might be scfq ;-) >> >> > Well, any concrete plans? > We are continuing to evaluate jOOQ in our scala development and although > for now we need only to get it working right and usable enough, but in > foreseeable future we are interested in global improvements in jOOQ's scala > implementation and we can help maybe in implementing smth. > I personally think that jOOQ is the best way to write SQL in Java. And it will eventually also be the best way to write SQL in Scala and other JVM languages. But right now, I will not be able to spend much time on a professional long-term jOOQ / Scala integration as I have other priorities with jOOQ. This includes not being able to accept / maintain larger contributions in that area, right now. It is certainly something to think about for 2014, though! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
