Hi! > What I'm trying to say is, it may be worth evaluating to write scooq, > instead of adding 1-2 utilities to jOOQ. Or since Scala is mainly > functional, not OO, a "better" name might be scfq ;-) > > Well, any concrete plans? We are continuing to evaluate jOOQ in our scala development and although for now we need only to get it working right and usable enough, but in foreseeable future we are interested in global improvements in jOOQ's scala implementation and we can help maybe in implementing smth.
Nikolay -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "jOOQ User Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
