See my reply at the end prefixed by “Mike>”.

From: Jim Schaad [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Thursday, October 02, 2014 10:52 AM
To: 'Richard Barnes'; 'Barry Leiba'
Cc: 'The IESG'; [email protected]; 
[email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [jose] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key-33: 
(with DISCUSS and COMMENT)



From: Richard Barnes [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2014 9:06 PM
To: Barry Leiba
Cc: Jim Schaad; The IESG; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>; 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>;
 [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [jose] Richard Barnes' Discuss on draft-ietf-jose-json-web-key-33: 
(with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:45 PM, Barry Leiba 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> Section 8.
> "[TBD]@ietf.org<http://ietf.org>"
> This needs to be populated before approval.  I don't know what's customary
> here, but "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" is an obvious candidate.
>
> [JLS] If this is going to be an IANA moderated list, then it should be
> filled in by IANA at the time of publishing and not now.  I believe that was
> the original intent.

IANA does not moderate lists, and almost all of these sorts of lists
live on ietf.org<http://ietf.org>.  You're even asking for this one to be on 
ietf.org<http://ietf.org>
(not on iana.org<http://iana.org>).  There's no reason for IANA to care what 
list is
used; they will simply track whether the review was posted, and will
interact with the DE.

Barry: Would [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> be a sensible thing to put 
here?

[JLS] I don’t have any objections to using [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. 
 However the original discussions for this was it would be some type of “expert 
review” list similar to the mime-types list.  I don’t know that the jose list 
would provide the same semantics.

Mike> The point of having a separate list in the spec from the working group 
list is that at some point (even if it’s years from now), the working group 
will be gone and registration requests will continue to come in.  That’s why 
the suggested list name is [email protected] rather than 
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.  This follows the precedent that OAuth 
registrations go to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> 
rather than [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>.

                                                            -- Mike

_______________________________________________
jose mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose

Reply via email to