> [JLS] I don't have any objections to using [email protected]. However the > original discussions for this was it would be some type of "expert review" > list similar to the mime-types list. I don't know that the jose list would > provide the same semantics.
Right, that's why I said that it depends. The media-types list is rather a special case, as it's *extremely* active. There are others like that, such as uri-review. If you're not expecting many registrations very soon, and the working group will close after the documents are done, then it makes sense to use the jose list because by the time you start getting registrations that list won't be active for the working group. If you're expecting the jose list to have active discussion of documents while registration requests are coming in, then it makes sense to create a new list. Use your judgment. b _______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
