On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 2:23 PM, Barry Leiba <[email protected]> wrote:
> > [JLS] I don't have any objections to using [email protected]. However the > > original discussions for this was it would be some type of "expert > review" > > list similar to the mime-types list. I don't know that the jose list > would > > provide the same semantics. > > Right, that's why I said that it depends. > > The media-types list is rather a special case, as it's *extremely* > active. There are others like that, such as uri-review. > > If you're not expecting many registrations very soon, and the working > group will close after the documents are done, then it makes sense to > use the jose list because by the time you start getting registrations > that list won't be active for the working group. > I expect that this is the more likely case. Mike, Jim, do you agree? To Mike's point, just because the WG closes down doesn't mean the mailing list does. One other possibility: Just re-use the oauth-ext-review@ list. It's probably going to be pretty much the same people anyway. --Richard > If you're expecting the jose list to have active discussion of > documents while registration requests are coming in, then it makes > sense to create a new list. > > Use your judgment. > > b >
_______________________________________________ jose mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/jose
