On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 08:36:13PM +0100, Stefan Breunig wrote: > PS: I believe there's a bug, have a look at > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.784482&lon=8.308449&zoom=18&layers=B000FTF > / Königsberger Straße/Landsberger Straße. My guess that the eastern > one actually should be a "2" (unless there really are two 24's on the > same street or they are on different streets but the numbering doesn't > make any sense). This is another advantage for interpolation, because > OSM Inspector would have warned about this ;)
How could the interpolation make the warning easier? I mean collecting
all number with the same addr:street and making a dupe count or looking
at the interpolation way and checking for dupes is basically the same.
And you are right - seems broken 24 on the NW is obviously wrong ... I
just checked my records from the survey and its actually 21 ...
Corrected in the data already ...
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff f...@rfc822.org +49-171-2280134
Those who would give up a little freedom to get a little
security shall soon have neither - Benjamin Franklin
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ josm-dev mailing list josm-dev@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/josm-dev
